Repeal the HB6 Coal Bailout
Urgent: Please send a digital letter to your legislators urging them to JUST VOTE ALREADY on SB117 and HB351.
OVEC and HB6
The repeal of HB6 is incomplete without a full repeal of the bailout for the Ohio Valley Electric Corporation (OVEC) coal plants--Kyger Creek in Ohio and Clifty Creek in Indiana.
The OVEC coal bailout was only added to HB6 after three of Ohio’s electric utilities--AEP, Duke, AES Ohio (formerly Dayton Power & Light--opposed FirstEnergy getting a bailout for the Davis Besse and Perry nuclear plants. It’s important to note that FirstEnergy is a partial owner of the OVEC plants and is currently trying to detach itself from the corporation. It was only after the legislature provided AEP, Duke, and AES Ohio a bailout for OVEC that those companies changed their position to one of support for the exceedingly corrupt HB6. FirstEnergy also benefitted from the OVEC bailout in HB6. AEP, the largest shareholder of OVEC, was subpoenaed for its involvement in the HB 6 scandal.
Before the passage of HB6, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) had already approved bailouts for AEP, Duke, FirstEnergy, and AES Ohio’s shares of the OVEC coal plants through the mid 2020s with an argument that the plants could be profitable if power prices were to increase significantly. Instead, the plants have lost money every single year and been a financial drain and environmental burden on Ohioans.
HB6 fundamentally altered the OVEC bailout by extending and expanding it.
HB6 has forced Ohioans to pay more than $140.4 million in subsidies to bail out the Kyger Creek coal plant in Gallia County, Ohio, and Clifty Creek coal plant in Indiana. Over that same period the two plants have spewed more than 17 million tons of carbon dioxide into the air. "For all this, Ohioans can thank our General Assembly, which has failed to yank House Bill 6, root and branch, out of the Revised Code."
HB6 extended the bailout of the OVEC coal plants to 2030. HB6 expanded the bailout of the OVEC coal plants to require FirstEnergy customers to pay for the bailout starting in 2020. All the money collected from FirstEnergy customers is handed over to AEP, Duke, and AES Ohio to further subsidize the bailouts for those companies.
HB6 also limited PUCO’s ability to protect customers from the OVEC bailout by allowing AEP, Duke, and AES Ohio to recover all “prudent” costs without defining what costs are “prudent.”
The solution: Senate Bill 117 and House Bill 351
Ohioans should not be on the hook for AEP, Duke, and AES Ohio’s bad bet on the OVEC plants.
Ohioans shouldn’t be paying more each month to bail out two dirty, inefficient, expensive 1950s coal plants for the next decade. These plants should be retired, not bailed out. SB117 and HB351 are the first step in that process.
Each of the bills is a full repeal of the OVEC coal plant bailout, and includes a refund to ratepayers. Both bills are bipartisan, and Governor DeWine has said he supports a repeal of the OVEC coal bailout.
SB117 and HB351 must be passed so the PUCO will regain its authority to protect customers from the continued excessive OVEC bailout costs, and so the OVEC owners--AEP, Duke, AES Ohio--can take responsibility for the power plants that they own and that do not benefit Ohioans.
SB117 and HB351 must be passed so FirstEnergy customers will no longer be on the hook for the OVEC plants--a cost they weren’t paying before HB6 was signed into law.
SB117 and HB351 must be passed to limit utility influence and money--money collected from customers--in the legislature. The OVEC bailout in HB6 was a handout to AEP, Duke, and AES Ohio to get their support for the corrupt HB6. Ohioans should dictate what goes into legislation, not big companies like AEP, Duke, and AES Ohio.
Proponent testimony for SB117 was held in May 2021. Testimony came from a large and vocal group of stakeholders. Business owners, environmental advocates, and members of the public all voiced their support for SB117.
Opponent testimony for SB117 was held June 15, 2021. It starkly contrasted the proponent hearing in that the only opposition came from representatives of the utility companies.
Both bills are stuck in committee, but you can urge your legislators to get SB117 and HB351 out on the floor for a vote ASAP!
History of OVEC
While OVEC was initially developed in response to national security concerns during the 1950s, OVEC’s contract with the Department of Energy ended in 2003. It was after this time that OVEC signed contracts with Ohio’s AEP, Duke, AES Ohio and a host of other power providers that extended the life of the power plants through 2040. The OVEC units no longer provided power for uranium enrichment facilities, which had begun the decommissioning process.
After the end of the Department of Energy contract, all generation from the OVEC units began to be sold into the marketplace. OVEC contract holders renegotiated in 2011 extending a new contract out to 2040 without seeking approval from the PUCO. This decision effectively extended the Ohio utilities’ utilities to commitment to pay OVEC costs--whatever they end up being--through 2040. The owners made a bad deal, and are trying now to offload that bad contract onto its customers.
AEP, Duke, and AES Ohio have been losing money on their ownership share of these plants for years and that is projected to continue.
PUCO carried out an audit of the OVEC bailout in 2020. The independent auditor confirmed the OVEC bailout has not just been a bad investment to date but also that with increased capital investment, those costs will go up even more. Additionally, the auditor found the OVEC coal plants were being run at times where the costs would be even higher for customers; customers would save money if the plants just weren’t being run.
In late 2020, the OVEC plants filed with USEPA that each plant will comply with new environmental protections rather than retire. These new capital investments will mean new debt and costs for Ohioans.
The Ohio Consumers’ Counsel says that so far $254 million in coal subsidies have gone to OVEC coal plants since the beginning of 2020. Another $287,000 rolls in EVERY DAY.
Senate Energy & Public Utilities Committee Chair Bob Peterson
Proponent Testimony on Senate Bill 117
Testimony of Melissa K. English
Deputy Director, Ohio Citizen Action
May 12, 2021
Chair Peterson, Vice-Chair Schuring, Ranking Member Williams, and Members of the Energy & Public Utilities Committee, my name is Melissa English and I’m the Deputy Director of Ohio Citizen Action. I thank you for the opportunity to present our support for Senate Bill 117.
This testimony is presented on behalf of Ohio Citizen Action’s 32,000 members and all Ohio utility ratepayers who have a stake in the decision before you.
While we acknowledge that portions of House Bill 6, the bill at the center of a $61 million bribery scandal, have been revoked, the repeal is incomplete without a full reversal of the bailout for two dirty coal plants operated by the Ohio Valley Electric Corporation or OVEC.
OVEC is owned by Ohio’s major electric utilities and consists of two large coal plants – Kyger Creek in Cheshire, Ohio and Clifty Creek in Madison, Indiana. OVEC was formed in 1952 by utilities to provide electric services in the Ohio River Valley to provide power for uranium enrichment facilities then under construction by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission in Portsmouth. Many of those who support the OVEC bailout will often point out the fact that the plants were a national security resource as they powered the factory making the atomic bomb materials at the heart of the U.S. Cold War strategy. That was true once but has not been for decades. And it was not true when the utilities in question negotiated their latest intercompany power agreement that is in effect until June 30, 2040.
Before the passage of House Bill 6, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) had already approved bailouts for AEP, Duke, and Dayton Power & Light’s shares of the OVEC coal plants through the mid-2020s with an argument that the plants could be profitable if power prices were to increase significantly. Instead, the plants have lost money every single year and been a financial drain and environmental burden on Ohioans.
Rather than retiring these two dirty, inefficient, expensive 1950s coal plants, these corporations made decisions that led to bailout charges on the electric bill of Ohio consumers. We must not lose sight of the fact that the OVEC coal bailout was added to House Bill 6 after three of Ohio’s electric utilities – AEP, Duke, Dayton Power & Light – opposed First Energy and Energy Harbor getting a bailout for the Davis Besse and Perry nuclear power plants. It was only after the legislature provided these other utilities a bailout for the OVEC that those companies changed their position to one of support for the anti-consumer bill steeped in corruption. House Bill 6 extended the bailout of the OVEC plants to 2030.
Originally marketed as Ohio’s “Clean Air Program” when introduced in 2019, House Bill 6 now only contains the OVEC coal bailout and the removal of the renewable energy and efficiency standards. These provisions will result in an increase in harmful emissions, a lack of reliability for our energy future, and a black eye on Ohio in the clean energy market. It is time to be proud of Ohio again, to embrace innovation and reject the culture of corporate greed and government corruption. To do this, we must repeal ALL of House Bill 6 for Ohio ratepayers. We urge your support of the OVEC repeal contained in Senate Bill 117 and thank you for your consideration.