![]() |
| ||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() | ||||||||||||
| FIND A BUSINESS | » OR Search By Biz Name, Location | ||||
|
|
INSIDE News » The Plain Dealer » Newsflash » Weather » Traffic » Obituaries » Opinion » Business » Crime » Politics » Education
|
![]()
| |||||||||||||||||
Editorials
Yes, governor: now 06/20/02 Why now?
Gov. Bob Taft unveiled an election reform plan Tuesday, a plan that
would remove much of the soft and untraceable money from the political
system. It's a solid plan that ought to become law. But Taft candidly
noted that the measure has little chance of going anywhere this year. He's right. And he's partly to blame. Taft and legislative leaders appear interested mostly in paying lip
service to election reform. Taft once pledged decisive steps to open up
Ohio's political process and to remove the veil of anonymity that
facilitates the flow of untraceable special-interest money. Then, for two
long years, nothing happened. Now, with his war chest fat and the legislature about to recess, Taft
has embraced a reform plan created by Secretary of State J. Kenneth
Blackwell. This plan gives Taft an issue to trumpet during his re-election
campaign, but its timing denies the public the benefit of a law that would
require full disclosure of political contributions during the course of
the campaign. Taft could dispel our cynicism by demanding that the legislature enact
the reforms prior to the November election. If the legislature does not
comply before it adjourns this week or next, he could call the legislature
into special session. That's what he should do, but probably won't. Much has been made of the heavily exploited loopholes in Ohio's
campaign finance laws. Those seeking to donate anonymously to candidates
or advocacy groups can legally launder their donations through local or
state party organizations, which simply redirect the money. The Taft-Blackwell proposal would, among other things, require the
disclosure of every dollar entering the political arena. Money given to
parties to pay for salaries and other operating expenses would have to be
reported, as would money donated by advocacy groups. Such a measure would represent remarkable progress toward open
government. Taft himself has rightly said that "full disclosure is needed
to allow voters to scrutinize the funding sources of candidates and issue
advocacy campaigns." So do something about it, governor. Demand that the legislature act now
- not after Nov. 5.
| |||||||||||||||||||
About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Help/Feedback | Advertise With Us © 2002 cleveland.com. All Rights Reserved. | |||||||||||||||||||