Cincy Beat
cover
listings
humor
news
movies
music
arts & entertainment
dining
classifieds
personals
mediakit
home
special
issues
volume 7, issue 38; Aug. 9-Aug. 15, 2001
Search:
Recent Issues:
Issue 37 Issue 36 Issue 35
Spend Less, Tell More
Also This Issue

Campaign reform waits on city council

By Steve Barjaktarovich

Cincinnati City Council has so far balked at asking voters to approve campaign-finance reform, including public funding of city council campaigns.

Citizens for Fair Elections, a coalition of 14 groups, last week asked council to place on the ballot a charter amendment that would require more details about campaign spending and would offer public funds to candidates who agree to limit their spending.

Supporters collected 11,700 signatures on petitions to put the issue on the ballot. Council must pass a resolution before the measure gets there.

Lauren Coletta, director of field operations and grassroots efforts for Common Cause, joined Citizens for Fair Elections in presenting the petitions to city council Aug. 2.

"This issue is not going away," Coletta says. "Cincinnati is not alone."

Instead of restricting how much candidates can spend -- ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court -- the Fair Elections Coalition proposes setting voluntary limits for candidates and rewarding participants with public funds. The proposal offers $2 in public funds for every $1 raised by a campaign, with a maximum of about $100,000 for council candidates and about $200,000 for mayoral candidates.

The proposal would limit individual donors to contributions of $1,000 each, and political parties could only give a donation of $10,000 to a candidate.

The amendment would also create the five-member Cincinnati Elections Commission (CEC), with subpoena power to monitor campaigns and to fine any violators. The commission would consist of a member of each of the three local political parties and two citizens who are independents. Members could not be currently active in politics or the municipal government.

New York and San Francisco have already enacted a form of the Fair Elections Amendment. States such as Massachusetts and Arizona are considering campaign finance reform, according to Coletta.

"People need to connect the dots," Coletta says. "Learn how this issue affects our lives."

Seemingly unrelated bills such as cable-television could be higher, because companies need money to donate to candidates, she said.

Council postponed putting the amendment on the ballot, waiting until Sept. 5 to decide. The deadline for issues in the fall election is Sept. 7.

David Crowley, a Democrat, urged council to act.

"Support the amendment," Crowley said. "It levels the playing field. It allows a no one to have a chance."

The charter amendment would require candidates to report, within five days, any contribution of $500 or more received within 20 days of the election. The same would apply to expenditures of $1,000 or more. ©

E-mail the editor


Previously in News

Out of This World
By John Stoehr (August 2, 2001)

A Riotous History
By Rebecca Lomax (August 2, 2001)

Listen Up, Big Shots
By Maria Rogers (July 26, 2001)

more...


Other articles by Steve Barjaktarovich

Science Gone Mad (July 19, 2001)
Burning Questions (July 12, 2001)
Burning Questions (June 14, 2001)

personals | cover | listings | humor | news | movies | music | arts & entertainment | dining | classifieds | mediakit | home

A Fuller Perspective
Mayoral candidate pushes positive thinking

Going Dutch
Your Negro Tour Guide does Amsterdam

Porkopolis
Curly tales of the city

Burning Questions
Is the Bottom Line Really Just a Suicide Note?

Eating Corpses for Food and Science
Respectable Drugs and the Mental Health Craze

Statehouse
Ohio Discovers the Internet

Your Negro Tour Guide
There's a Riot Goin' On

City Lights
News to Use

Sports: Take a Walk on the Local Side
There's still a powerful antidote to cynicism about big-time sports

Letters







Advertise Online!



This site hosted by RoadRunner


Cincinnati CityBeat covers news, public issues, arts and entertainment of interest to readers in Greater Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky. The views expressed in these pages do not necessarily represent those of the publishers. Entire contents are copyright 2001 Lightborne Publishing Inc. and may not be reprinted in whole or in part without prior written permission from the publishers. Unsolicited editorial or graphic material is welcome to be submitted but can only be returned if accompanied by a self-addressed, stamped envelope. Unsolicited material accepted for publication is subject to CityBeat's right to edit and to our copyright provisions.