M/CLOUDY
41°
more weather




Thursday,
October 24, 2002

 



Tips on searching


Browse Last 30 Days
The Blade Archives
AP Archives


Latest News
Sports
Business
Arts & Entertainment
Davis-Besse In-depth
Opinion
Religion
Health & Science
Columnists
Obituaries
Special Reports
Weather
AP Wire
Photos of the Day
Ohio Lottery
Michigan Lottery


General
Homes
Autos
Jobs
Boats/Recreation
Celebrations
Legal Notices
Directory of Worship
Personals

Events Calendar
Educational Services
Directories
Forums
E-thepeople
TV Listings
Movie Showtimes
Horoscopes


toledo
HBA Parade of Homes
Contests
KidZone
Mud Hens Web Cam


Set As Homepage
Subscriber Services
Email Newsletter
The Blade e-edition
Advertise
About Us
Contact Us
Help & FAQs

Ohio News | Article published Thursday, October 24, 2002
OHIO SUPREME COURT
Candidates clash over political ads, malpractice rates

By JIM PROVANCE
BLADE COLUMBUS BUREAU


CLEVELAND - Two candidates for a seat on the Ohio Supreme Court yesterday clashed in a rare public debate, accusing each other of failing to do enough to halt the proliferation of special interest commercials predicting how they would rule.

Incumbent Republican Justice Evelyn Stratton and her Democratic challenger, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Judge Janet Burnside, politely took jabs at each other during an hour-long debate at the City Club of Cleveland.

"The justice system and the Ohio Supreme Court are under attack in this state in this race," said Judge Burnside.

She challenged Justice Stratton to disavow a current television commercial by an anonymously funded, business-backed organization, Informed Citizens of Ohio, that suggests the justice "understands" concerns over rising medical malpractice insurance premiums, presumably because of frivolous lawsuits.

Justice Stratton fell just short of disavowing the ad, noting that it refers only to her past record.

"If anyone would interpret it as to how I would vote on tort reform, that would be wrong," she said. "I have never stated publicly how I would vote on tort reform ... Certainly, it does not attack her. It is not a negative ad. She didn’t mention anything about this ad that just came out that trashes me to pieces. She conveniently stayed away from that."

Justice Stratton was referring to an ad that features criticism of her from David Norgard, a former Brush Wellman employee suffering from fatal chronic beryllium disease. The ad is funded by trial lawyers, teachers, and labor unions - Judge Burnside’s base of support.

Justice Stratton was among the dissenters of a 4-3 decision in May that ultimately kept Mr. Norgard’s suit against Brush alive by determining the statute of limitations had not expired. Mr. Norgard praised Judge Burnside, even though she played no role in the case.

Judge Burnside later said she hadn’t seen the ad but stood by her position that all negative ads should be pulled from the air.

"I said in my first television advertisement that big corporations and special interests are trying to control the court," she said. "That’s exactly what I meant because that’s exactly what I see. No one should control the Ohio Supreme Court."

Back to the issue of medical malpractice, Justice Stratton said she disagreed with an audience member who suggested that arguments that doctors were leaving their practices in Ohio because of escalating malpractice premiums are mere campaign scare tactics.

"Every time I go into a different county, I have a different group of doctors who tell me they’re leaving the state, they’re quitting OB-GYN practice. Cincinnati has dropped from 31 neurosurgeons to 13," she said.

"I wish it were a scare tactic, but I’m afraid it’s not," she said. "It’s not a simple answer though."

But she added that it’s up to society and the legislature to deal with the issue.

Judge Burnside, however, argued that the Informed Citizens ad makes it appear that the election of Justice Stratton is the solution.

"This problem is complex," she said. "It’s not going to be substantiated by anecdotal evidence."

Justice Stratton is seeking a second six-year term on what she considers to be a 4-3 "activist" court. Although she resisted being labeled pro-business or pro-tort reform during the debate, she welcomed the label of "judicial restraint," the description given to the justices who say they leave policy decisions to the legislature.

The candidates for a second court seat, Republican Lt. Gov. Maureen O’Connor and Democratic Hamilton County Municipal Judge Tim Black, will appear with Justice Stratton and Judge Burnside on Tuesday in a live television forum sponsored by the League of Women Voters.

Ms. O’Connor and Judge Black are running for the seat to be vacated by Toledo Republican Justice Andy Douglas, 70, who is barred from seeking another term because of his age.


More articles on this subject »
Ex-Brush worker hammers Stratton over beryllium case 10/23/2002
O’Connor stresses credentials to serve on court 10/22/2002
Ohio top-court hopefuls raise nearly $5 million 10/19/2002
Ad claims business steers GOP candidates 10/16/2002
Ohio high court race poised for TV 10/12/2002

Article Features »
Printer-friendly version
Forum on this topic
Email to a friend
View the Latest News index
Subcategories »
2002 Census

America Remembers

Davis-Besse

Accidents/Vehicular

City of Toledo

Courts

Crime

Elections

Environment

Fires

Higher Education

K-12 Education

Michigan News

Minority Issues

Obituaries - News

Ohio News

Other

Politics

Regional News

Religion

Suburban News

Transportation

War on terrorism

Weather

Zoo & Library










©2002 The Blade. Privacy Statement. By using this service, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement: Please read it.

The Toledo Blade Company, 541 N. Superior St., Toledo, OH 43660, (419) 724-6000
To contact a specific department or an individual person, click here.