NEWSPAPER SEARCH 
 FIND A BUSINESS 



INSIDE
The Plain Dealer
» News
» Business
» Crime
» Education
» In-Depth
» Lottery
» NewsFlash
» Opinion/Columns
» PD Front Page
» Politics
» Traffic
» Weather
» News Obituaries
» PD Obituaries
» Paid Death Notices






SPEAK UP!
» Join the discussion on today's top stories

» Log On to ChatXtra Now!
NEWSLETTERS
» Sign up for the daily News Updates
» More Newsletters
 

» Subscribe to our Personal Finance newsletter.


www.cleveland.com/entertainment/


SOME OF TODAY'S
BEST LOCAL JOBS


Find More Of Today's
Best Local Jobs On


» Click Here


FROM OUR ADVERTISERS
>> Win a trip to Hawaii
>> Chevrolet, visit your Favorite Network Dealer!
>> Real Estate...for the SMART homeseller

» Advertise With Us


» More From The Plain Dealer

News

Voting machines under review in Columbus

08/14/03

Julie Carr Smyth
Plain Dealer Bureau

Columbus - One of the new electronic voting machines being paraded before state lawmakers and marketed to county elections officials has yet to receive federal certification or to be used in an election.

The machine's maker, North Canton-based Diebold Election Systems, is in line to be named as a finalist tomorrow for selling voting machines statewide. And state negotiators say the firm could conceivably deploy the new machine, the Accu-Vote TSX, around the state under county contracts it lands.

The state's own specifications said machines presented to negotiators had to be federally certified before negotiations began.

Eric Seabrook, legal counsel to Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, insisted yesterday that Diebold did not violate those guidelines because its earlier machine, the TS, was the subject of negotiations. He said the TSX could be used in Ohio, but only after it receives the proper approvals.

"There will be no machine used in an Ohio election that hasn't met all criteria in Ohio," Seabrook said. "It was required of all vendors that they provide their latest and best technology for us to evaluate.

But, more critically, if they have a better version that comes out, they have to give us that technology at no additional cost."

Seabrook said the TSX is akin to a new model year of an automobile.

He also said, despite Diebold's plans to deploy the TSX exclusively, the state could still reject the newer model if it wants.

"We're not putting ourselves in a bait-and-switch situation here," he said.

Another vendor finalist - Election Systems & Software - was also apparently asked during negotiations to provide Ohio with an upgraded version of its software, which also is not yet certified. That request followed reports about slow boot-up times of ES&S machines cited in a Florida Inspector General's report.

But ES&S Senior Vice President Dan McGinnis said the machines it has presented in negotiations with the state were all certified before negotiations began, as bid documents required.

In the certification process, federal experts review and test both the hardware and software of each machine and, once their recommendation is approved by the Federal Elections Commission, states follow up with their own tests.

"We were told as recently as yesterday [Tuesday] that we should be showing only certified products, and we are," McGinnis said. "The system we have presented is tried and proven and it is the one that will be delivered to Ohio."

Diebold, a politically connected and generous machine maker, has been under national fire for purported security flaws in its software. Studies by Johns Hopkins and Rice universities and a report in the online Wired magazine all suggested the system could be easily hacked - charges the firm has contested.

Diebold featured two machines - including the uncertified TSX - in voting equipment demonstrations at the Statehouse last week, and company spokesman Mike Jacobsen said the company intends to use the TSX in Ohio.

He said the machine is lighter and friendlier to disabled voters, such as those in wheelchairs or who are blind, than the TS predecessor.

He said the machine viewed by lawmakers was a prototype and that the machine has not yet been in "heavy manufacture." Certification is expected in four to five weeks, he said.

Based on Blackwell's own timeline, that could mean that Ohio counties selecting Diebold will have to commit to an uncertified, untested technology - despite the rigors of Blackwell's vendor screening process.

Catherine Turcer, an elections expert with Ohio Citizen Action, called that prospect "scary."

"I think the secretary should consider slowing down," Turcer said. "Sure, it would be fabulous to have new machines by next year, but it's important that people have faith in this process. The process has been very worrisome."

Ohio's conversion to new machines, which could cost as much as $161 million, follows the debacle that occurred in Florida during the 2000 presidential election.

Blackwell wants to replace punch cards in Ohio by next year's presidential election.

To reach this Plain Dealer reporter:

jsmyth@plaind.com, 1-800-228-8272


© 2003 The Plain Dealer. Used with permission.
» Send This Page | » Print This Page
MORE NEWS
» Afghan violence leaves 58 dead in bombing, outbreak of fighting
» Arms deal suspect lauded bin Laden
» Autopsy: Baylor player was shot twice in head

More Stories | 14-Day Archive | Complete Index
MORE FROM THE PLAIN DEALER
Today's News | The Plain Dealer Links & Archives


The Best Local Classifieds: Jobs | Autos | Real Estate | Place An Ad

Special home delivery offer from The Plain Dealer! Save 18% off the newsstand price! Subscribe Now!


About Us | Help/Feedback | Advertise With Us

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement. Please read our Privacy Policy.
©2003 cleveland.com. All Rights Reserved.

Place an AdAll ClassifiedsReal EstateShop for autosJobs