| Pittsburgh, PA Friday April 4, 2003 |
| News Sports Lifestyle Classifieds About Us | |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Judge orders WTI worker reinstated to job at incinerator Friday, April 04, 2003 By Don Hopey, Post-Gazette Staff Writer
Donna Trueblood worked on the "drum crew" at the WTI hazardous waste
incinerator in East Liverpool, Ohio, not beating music time but keeping
track of barrels of incoming waste.
In February 2002, Trueblood told the Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency that her employer, VonRoll America, was accepting hazardous wastes
it was not permitted to incinerate and storing drums of chemical waste on
a parking lot at the adjacent Heritage Environmental Services, a separate
waste transfer facility that has an ownership interest in the incinerator.
VonRoll fired Trueblood in October 2002 for, it said, exceeding her
sick day limit. But federal Administrative Law Judge Richard Morgan ruled
last week that she was unlawfully terminated for blowing the whistle on
those illegal waste handling practices.
Morgan's 60-page decision scolds VonRoll for concocting a story to
cover up Trueblood's termination, and awards her $50,000 for back pay and
$125,000 in exemplary damages.
He also ordered WTI to reinstate her to her job, but added that her
return to work would be a "terrible mistake" and urged the company and
Trueblood to reach a different, mutually acceptable settlement.
VonRoll has filed notice that it will appeal the ruling to the U.S.
Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board in Washington, D.C.
Raymond Wayne, a WTI spokesman, said it is the company's policy not to
comment on pending cases or appeals. He said any action on Trueblood's
reinstatement is on hold pending the outcome of the appeal.
Richard Renner, Trueblood's attorney, said he contacted the company
last Friday about her reinstatement but has had no response. He said
provisions of the federal Energy Reorganization Act require that Trueblood
be reinstated and given back pay even though the appeal is pending.
"She can't wait forever. She's about to lose her home in East Liverpool
and she's flat run out of money," Renner said. "She's really suffered for
taking the stand that she did."
The WTI incinerator, in East Liverpool's poor East End neighborhood
along the Ohio River, 30 miles west of Pittsburgh, has been a lightning
rod for safety and health concerns since plans for its construction were
announced in the early 1980s. Despite strong opposition, the $140 million
incinerator was built 400 yards from an elementary school and finally
opened in 1993.
Incinerator opponents have seized on the waste handling irregularities
reported by Trueblood as confirming their fears about dangerous practices
at the incinerator that operates seven days a week, 24 hours a day,
burning 60,000 tons of hazardous waste a year.
Trueblood, worked in the waste industry since 1991 in her home state of
Louisiana, as well as in Texas, Iowa and California before getting a job
at WTI in 1998. She said she doesn't share the concerns of the incinerator
opponents, as long as the business operates by the rules.
"Incineration for the types of waste WTI handles is the best technology
we have," Trueblood, 39, said. "Some of the WTI waste is 'two-stepper'
stuff, meaning if you get a whiff of it you can take two steps and you're
gone. I can't see landfilling that kind of stuff, but I believe they could
handle it better."
Trueblood said the initial complaint to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency and the Ohio EPA about WTI's waste handling
irregularities came from another person at the facility, but when the
agencies contacted her at home she told them what she knew.
She told the agencies that WTI was storing hazardous wastes off-site at
Heritage Environmental open-air parking lot and had accepted shipments of
bromoform and 100 percent benzene that it did not have a permit to
incinerate.
She said the waste handling irregularities happened on "multiple
occasions," but she documented only one occasion for the investigating
agencies.
Benzene is a widely used industrial chemical and a known human
carcinogen.
Bromoform was used in the past as a solvent and flame retardant, or to
make other chemicals. It is now used mainly as a laboratory reagent.
Overexposure affects the central nervous system causing unconsciousness,
loss of reflexes, shallow breathing, erratic heart rate, and respiratory
failure.
| ||||||||
Back
to top E-mail this story ![]() | |||||||||
Copyright ©1997-2003 PG Publishing Co., Inc. All Rights Reserved. | |||||||||