| |
| | |
| Dec 30, 1992 | NEW YORK -- "...it is hardly encouraging that on [Gore's] first outing as the new administration's environmental czar, he's lined up with the antitechnology pagans in the environmentalist camp...." editorial, Wall Street Journal. |
| Dec 15, 1992 | LITTLE ROCK, AR -- Citizens deliver to President-elect Clinton's office petitions containing 20,000 signatures of residents opposed to WTI. NEW YORK -- "Please Mr. President-elect, Give our town hope," full-page Von Roll ad in the New York Times, Washington Post, and papers in East Liverpool and Little Rock. |
| Dec 7, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- Statement on WTI, Vice President-Elect Al Gore, New York Times, United Press International. |
| Nov 26, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Four teachers
arrested on Nov 23 are released, after spending two
days, including Thanksgiving Day, in jail. |
| Nov 24, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Four of the
teachers arrested on Nov 23 plead "no contest". They
are fined $150.00 plus $48.50 in court costs. They are sentenced
to 48 hours in jail, 8 hours of community service and
one year probation. |
| Nov 23, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Peaceful
protest at WTI site. Seven teachers and two bystanders arrested.
Since Oct 13, 1992 there have been 183 arrests,
including arrest of physicians, nurses, teachers, attorneys, union members,
grandparents and parents. |
| Nov 22, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Over 500
people attend a peaceful rally in the rain. Seventy-five citizens arrested
at the site for criminal trespass. |
| Nov 20, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Six small business owners arrested for blocking the WTI gates. |
| Nov 19, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Eleven union members arrested for blocking the WTI gates. |
| Nov 18, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Two physicians and three nurses arrested for blocking the WTI gates. |
| Nov 17, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Eleven parents arrested for blocking the WTI gates. |
| Nov 16, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Eight grandparents arrested for blocking the WTI gates. |
| Nov 13, 1992 | CHARLESTON, WV -- Federal District Judge Fred
Stamp denies West Virginia's petition for an injunction basing his
decision on his belief that the certainty that WTI would lose money
outweighed the risk of harm to the community. |
| Oct 22, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Two Ohio residents, Alonzo Spencer
and Jeff Bennett, filed a Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive
Relief against the CCPA, ODOT and WTI for the illegal sale of public CCPA property to a private, forprofit Swiss
Corporation.
|
| Oct 16, 1992 | CHARLESTON, WV -- Hearing on West Virginia
preliminary injunction concludes.
| | Oct 13, 1992 | CHARLESTON, WV -- Four day hearing begins on
preliminary injunction by West Virginia to block operation of
incinerator. |
| Oct 5, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- Ohio Senator Howard
Metzenbaum in a letter to U.S. EPA Administrator William Reilly,
concerning a three-page secret memo from U.S. EPA Regional Counsel Nancy
Ellen Zusman to all senior EPA regional personnel working
on WTI, wrote, "I was shocked by the contents of the ... ...
memorandum" "The memo outlined a sixteen point chronology of steps
that U.S. EPA would undertake culminating in a date certain in which, 'WTI
would be allowed to bring hazardous waste on site (Feb. 1993).'
What the memo makes clear is that it was the position of U.S. EPA all
along to give WTI the goahead. The questions raised by the U.S. EPA
Inspector General, the administrative appeals and other outstanding
issues were merely to be handled for public relations purposes. There
would be no serious examination of the issues, just a resume of steps
to be completed before announcing the final decision to bring hazardous
waste on site." "I don't believe that I have ever seen such
irresponsibility on the part of government officials. The Region V
staff from the Administrator down through the fourteen other
individuals to whom the Zusman memo was addressed are so completely
compromised that the public has no chance of getting a fair
determination. And I am frank to say to you that you don't seem to
understand that you are being made a party to this. I urge you to
suspend the WTI permit, and to designate an entirely new team to
undertake a complete review of the WTI/RCRA
situation." |
| Oct 5, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- Associate Administrator Lew
Crampton, self-described "people's advocate" assigned to act as
"community liaison" between the U.S. EPA and citizens concerned about
WTI, leaves U.S. EPA to work for Waste Management,
Inc. |
| Oct 1, 1992 | CHICAGO, IL -- U.S. EPA Press Release:
"WTI May accept hazardous waste and begin shakedown; EPA begins 30
day comment period on proposed approval of WTI permit
modification." "EPA is seeking public comment on its legal
determination on issues of ownership and operational control."
"After a two-month review of information on WTI's ownership and
operational control, EPA has determined that a minor, or Class I,
modification is appropriate to name Von Roll (Ohio), Inc., as an
operator of the facility. WTI has requested a Class I modification to
reflect this change. The Agency further decided that the permit
correctly identifies WTI as the owner and an operator of the facility.
EPA Region V fully consulted EPA Headquarters on this legal matter and
the decision was made jointly." |
| Sep 25, 1992 | CHICAGO, IL -- U.S. EPA Region V Administrator
Valdas Adamkus writes to WTI President Blake Marshall, saying:
"In addition, the U.S. EPA will inform WTI of its decision on the
owner/operator issue no later than Oct 1, 1992. U.S. EPA Region V
will be making this decision in full consultation with U.S. EPA
Headquarters and U.S. EPA's Office of General Counsel. Until this
issue is resolved, WTI may not accept hazardous waste onsite." |
| Sep 30, 1992 | U.S. EPA Region 5 Administrator Valdas Adamkus
writes to WTI President Blake Marshall, saying, "U.S. EPA
has concluded that there has been no change in ownership for the
purposes of the Resource Conservation and Recovery act ("RCRA") which
would require modification of the WTI permit." However, we do believe
that there has been a change in operational control and that Von Roll
(Ohio), Inc. ("VRO") is now an operator of the Facility." Just three weeks earlier, on Sep 8, 1992, the U.S. EPA had determined that Von
Roll America, Inc. should be added to the WTI permit as an
owner. |
| Sep 18, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Sale of public Port
Authority property to WTI consummated. The land on which WTI is built was purchased by the State under eminent domain using taxpayers money to develop a port for public use has been sold to a private, for-profit
Swiss Corporation. |
| Sep 8, 1992 | CHICAGO, IL -- U.S. EPA Region 5
Counsel Nancy Ellen Zusman, in a Sep 8 letter to WTI Attorney
Chuck Waterman, wrote, "U.S. EPA has reviewed WTI's response to the
initial Jul 7, 1992, Section 3007 Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act Request for Information and the additional information requested on
Aug 5, 1992. As a result of U.S. EPA's review, U.S. EPA requests
that your client submit a formal Class 1 modification request to list
on the Facility permit ... Von Roll America, Inc. as an owner of the
Facility." "U.S. EPA believes that
with these modifications, the WTI permit will accurately reflect the
ownership status and operational control of the Facility, as required
by federal regulations, and will assure maximum accountability in the
operation of the Facility." |
| Sep 1, 1992 | CHARLESTON, WV -- Hearing on a
request by the State of West Virginia for a preliminary injunction to
block WTI operation. EPA/WTI agree to delay acceptance of waste at WTI
and commencement of "shakedown" activities until mid-Oct under an
agreement worked out during a hearing. The nine remaining strikers end
43-day hunger strike.
|
| Aug 31, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Criminal trespass charges against
seven opponents who took over the Ohio EPA headquarters offices are dropped
by the State of Ohio after protesters refused to accept a settlement with the EPA to avoid trial. |
| Aug 24, 1992 | CHICAGO, IL -- U.S. EPA Regional Counsel Nancy
Ellen Zusman wrote to Paula Cotter in the Ohio Attorney General's Office
formally requesting "... Ohio's analysis of the change of ownership and
partnership status for Waste Technologies Industries ("WTI")." " ... U.S. EPA is also examining these issues, but is
uncomfortable interpreting state law."
"Both U.S. EPA and Ohio are under a lot of pressure to come up with
an analysis as quickly as possible ..." "... the sooner you could
give me some kind of preliminary analysis, the better off I would feel
with U.S. EPA making its own analysis." Ms. Zusman knew that Law Clerk Ignacio Arrazola had analyzed Ohio partnership law at her request four days earlier, and
that decisions concerning the WTI permit had already been predetermined as
outlined in the Aug 21, 1992 secret memo. |
| Aug 28,
1992 | CHARLESTON, WV -- West Virginia attorney general files for a temporary restraining
order to block WTI from conducting trial burns; 17 of 25 citizens end
39-day hunger strike; nine citizens continue hunger
strike. |
| Aug 21,
1992 | CHICAGO, IL -- Secret memorandum by U.S. EPA Regional Counsel
Nancy Ellen Zusman -- "serves to memorialize the schedule of items
to be accomplished in relation to the Waste Technologies Industries
("WTI") hazardous waste incinerator in East Liverpool, Ohio, which was
discussed in a briefing of the Regional Administrator on Aug 20,
1992" "It was agreed that
the following activities would take place .." preceded a sixteen
point list and timetable, including, "The real estate transaction
between the Columbiana County Port Authority and WTI/Von Roll will
be consummated, clearing up the property owner problem. (mid-Sep)" "The permit will be modified to correct
the owner/operator issue. (Jan-Feb 1993)" and ending in Feb
1993 when "WTI will be allowed to bring hazardous waste onsite.
(Feb. 1993)". This memo shows
the decision to allow the incinerator to
move forward had been made before the completion of the ownership
investigation. The final submittals in response to the U.S. EPA's 3007
request for ownership information were not even turned in until Sep
30, 1992. |
| Aug 20, 1992 | CHICAGO, IL -- Draft Memorandum prepared for U.S. EPA
Region 5 Counsel Nancy Ellen Zusman by Law Clerk Ignacio Arrazola. The
issue of the memorandum was "Whether there has been an unapproved
transfer of the ownership of Waste Technologies Industries for purposes
of the RCRA permit" and if so "should the permit be revoked?"
This memo discussed Ohio Partnership law and the Ohio Uniform
Partnership Law extensively. Mr Arrazola writes: "Good
faith legal arguments can be made to either buoy or sink WTI's existing
permit. Ultimately, the decision of whether the permit should pass
through the legal niceties unscathed is a policy determination."
"The fact that the subsidiaries share the same
directors and officers, have no employees, have transferred management
control of the facility to Von Roll (Ohio), Inc., and have no assets
except their interest in WTI, tends to make a showing that the
subsidiaries are merely 'instrumentalities' of Von Roll America, Inc.
The partnership is thus reduced to a single partner, Von Roll
America, Inc. and it may be maintained that the partnership is
therefore dissolved." |
| Aug 11,
1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- CCPA and WTI signed a real estate purchase contract for $5 million
for the sale of CCPA public property, taken by eminent domain, to
WTI. |
| Aug 10,
1992 | NEW YORK, NY -- ABC News Nightline covers the WTI conflict. |
| Aug 4, 1992 | COLUMBUS -- Ohio EPA
Director Don Schregardus ordered the CCPA to add their name as
Co-permittee to the WTI permit. The Ohio EPA press release said:
"State Law [Ohio Administrative Code 37455041 (B)] requires property
owners to sign the permit application for hazardous waste facilities
located on their property. This law was in effect when the WTI permit
was in effect in 1984, and the Port Authority should have signed the
permit application at that time. Schregardus said that unless the
Port Authority submits the permit application within thirty days, he
will have to take enforcement action to force them to comply. The
addition of the Port Authority will be considered a modification to the
WTI hazardous waste permit, and will therefore be sent to the Ohio
Hazardous Waste Facility Board for review." |
| Aug 2, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Vice President Quayle visits Columbiana
County to collect campaign funds. |
| Aug 1, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- CCPA announces it wants to sell the land
taken by eminent domain and paid with state tax dollars to
WTI. |
| Jul 24, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- U.S. EPA Environmental appeals
board denies appeals on spray dryer approval but
overturns EPA Region 5's decision of Feb 3, 1992 to arbitrarily add
the CCPA to the WTI permit. |
| Jul 23,
1992 | CHICAGO, IL -- WTI Attorney Charles Waterman's letter to Nancy Ellen Zusman responds to U.S. EPA's 3007
ownership information request. EAST LIVERPOOL -- Recording artist Richard Marx visits East Liverpool in support of citizens. |
| Jul 22,
1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- U.S. EPA Assistant Administrator Don R. Clay, in a summary of WTI
issues and communication strategy, made the decision that, "It is true
that the individual partners constituting WTI have changed, but
this does not affect the permit status." This policy decision was sent only to certain
assistant and Associate Administrators, Regional Administrators and to
the White House. Regardless of changes
in ownership, the EPA backed WTI, and no matter what would be revealed
during the investigation, the EPA would give WTI the "green light" to
proceed. Mr. Clay told EPA Administrators that the WTI permit was valid,
despite the agencies public statements that it was still investigating the
issues. In the memo, Clay identified ownership of the plant as a major
issue. He told EPA Administrators that EPA had determined the permit
should remain unchanged, even though the EPA didn't receive all of the
ownership information until Sep 80, 1992. Clay wrote,
"The incinerator permit was issued to the overall WTI corporation, which we
believe has remained unchanged since the permit was issued. It is true
that the individual partners constituting WTI have changed, but this
does not affect the permit status." This shows predetermination by the EPA. |
| Jul 20, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- Meeting
set up jointly by concerned citizens and EPA officials at EPA
headquarters for EPA to present answers to all the
public's key questions related to the validity of WTI's permit. At the
meeting, top EPA officials, including Associate Administrator Lew
Crampton, said they did not have answers to even the most basic
questions regarding the real identity of the owner and the operator, and
whether the permit is actually valid. EPA officials refused to certify
either that the permit is valid or that the permit will be revoked because
of invalidity. EPA officials said they lacked sufficient information to
sign either certification. Citizens then asked that EPA not allow waste
on site or startup until EPA can determine whether or not the permit was
valid. When, after meeting with EPA officials for six hours, the
citizens said that they would not leave EPA's premises until EPA
signed a document certifying to one of the requested choices, EPA had
all citizens participants arrested and thrown in jail. Six of the
twelve citizens arrested begin a hunger strike. |
| Jul 19, 1992 | WEIRTON, WV -- WTI statements by candidates Clinton and Gore on the first leg of their Presidential campaign bus tour following the Democratic Convention. |
| Jul 16, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- U.S. EPA's Lew Crampton
meets with leaders of eleven different area citizen organizations who
present him with documentation of WTI's illegalities. |
| Jul 15, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- EPA's Inspector
General issues report requested by Congressman Harley Staggers (D-WV).
Report finds that neither the state or federal EPA followed
proper permitting procedures and raises questions about ownership
changes. |
| Jul 10, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- Fifty citizens from
the Ohio Valley protest U.S. EPA's decision to illegally grant WTI a 180-day temporary authorization to
burn wastes. Twelve entered and occupied the office
of U.S. EPA Administrator William Reilly. Associate Administrator
Lew Crampton was assigned to handle all discussions and negotiations
with the citizens, who refused to leave until EPA's temporary
authorization was revoked or delayed. By the end of the day, Lew
Crampton was assigned to be "community liaison for the concerned citizens.
Mr. Crampton described himself as the peoples "advocate".
It was agreed at that meeting that there would be a ten day stay of the
temporary authorization, and that Mr. Crampton would visit the WTI
site on Jul 16. |
| Jul 9, 1992 | CHICAGO, IL -- After
company officials hold a private meeting with Vice President Quayle's
Council on Competitiveness regarding "regulatory delays", the U.S. EPA,
while still trying to find out who owns and who will operate WTI, illegally grants WTI a temporary authorization to proceed with the shakedown. |
| Jul 7, 1992 | CHICAGO, IL -- U.S. EPA Region 5 formal information
request inquiring into the identification of the corporate partners of
WTI (Section 3007, RCRA). |
| Jun 17, 1992 | PITTSBURGH, PA -- The City of Pittsburgh joins the State of West Virginia's lawsuit to block WTI. |
| Jun 12, 1992 | CHICAGO, IL -- U.S. EPA informs WTI's attorney that the
Sep 21, 1990 operating contract evidences a change in operational
control and that WTI should have notified the Agency within 90 days of
the change. |
| Jun 10, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- Proponents meet at the
White House with Vice President Quayle's Competitiveness Council, and
with representatives from the White House Office of Management and
Budget, the President's Council of Economic Advisors, the White House's
Domestic Policy Office, and a deputy assistant administrator of
EPA. |
| May 21, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- Von Roll President Blake Marshall
writes Vice President Quayle, saying, among other things,
"The valid permits to construct we once had are now invalid"
in contrast to Von Roll's Feb 24, 1992
statement that all permits are valid. "To move forward we must
have a 180-day temporary authorization permit from U.S. EPA ...." |
| May 20, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- Ohio Senator Howard Metzenbaum introduces an amendment prohibiting WTI from burning
hazardous waste until court and administrative appeals have been fully
resolved. |
| May 17, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- March and rally; keynote is Dr. Peter Montague. |
| May 7, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- Congressional hearing on regulatory
process related to WTI permitting. EPA's Hugh Kaufman puts on record
Sept. 21, 1990 operating contract showing management control by Von Roll
(Ohio), Inc. U.S. EPA admits violating federal law by issuing a permit without CCPA listed as facility owner, and modifying the permit without public comment. The hearing is covered by ABC World News Tonight and the New York Times. |
| May 1, 1992 | RICHMOND, VA -- Letter
from Dr. Michael McCawley, Professor of Air Pollution Control at West
Virginia University, responds to Regional Administrator Val Adamkus'
Apr 2, 1992 letter concerning WTI site meteorology, saying,
"[I]t seems puzzling that you are not aware that well documented
evidence exists of the incidence of extreme stagnation conditions
throughout this portion of the eastern United States. Korshover
cites evidence of stagnations occurring approximately 220 times over
the thirty year period from 19361965 for this area" (U.S. Public Health Service Publication 999AP34, 1967). "This area of
the country provides the textbook example of air stagnation problems.
Are you aware of the proximity of the town of Donora, Pennsylvania to
the WTI site? Certainly you are aware that in Donora in 1948 it was a
stagnation condition that lasted for approximately one week that was
the purported cause of some 20 deaths attributed to the build up of air
pollutants. It was this air pollution incident in Donora that led to
the heightened awareness of air pollution problems and ultimately the
creation of your agency." "Donora, Pennsylvania is located 45
miles, as the pollution blows From East Liverpool, Ohio, the WTI site.
I do not believe the weather changes much over that small a distance.
Incidentally, the Ohio river goes through a slight horseshoe bend above
and below the WTI site as does the Monongahela as it flows through
Donora. The hillsides rise approximately 300 feet above the river at
the WTI site as do the hills surrounding Donora. Finally the stack
heights at the mills in Donora did not rise above the valley walls and
the same is true for the WTI stack." "It is unclear to me
what basis you or the state of Ohio used to conclude that stagnations
were not a concern at this location." |
| Apr 21, 1992 | CHARLESTON, WV -- West
Virginia Attorney General Mario Palumbo sues to revoke WTI permits based
on violations of federal law and nuisance. EAST LIVERPOOL -- Former California Governor and presidential candidate Jerry Brown visits East Liverpool to support citizens. |
| Apr 2, 1992 | CHICAGO, IL -- In a letter
regarding the air modeling used for WTI, and the issue of site
meteorology with respect to air inversions and stagnation conditions,
Region V administrator Valdas Adamkus writes, "Stagnation
conditions are rare events occurring in few locations and are not
expected to occur in the area of WTI." |
| Mar 24, 1992 | COLUMBUS -- Children take mice to Ohio Governor George Voinovich to protest state health study. |
| Mar 19, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- Congressman Harley Staggers of
West Virginia requests that the U.S. EPA office of the Inspector General
review the EPA's
permitting process for WTI, the effects of atmospheric inversions on air
quality, ownership and financial assurance issues and the technology used by
WTI. |
| Mar 13, 1992 | CHICAGO, IL -- On Jul 9, 1992, in a "Dear Interested
Party" letter, Mr. Bill Muno informed the public that on Mar 13, 1992,
WTI made a request to the U.S. EPA for temporary authorization to
operate the incinerator for a period of 180 days. The request for
temporary authorization included operation of the spray dryer
which did not have an effective Federal permit under
RCRA. |
| Mar 3, 1992 | CHICAGO, IL -- CCPA, the State of West Virginia, the City of Pittsburgh and others appeal
EPA's Feb 3, 1992 decision, to add the CCPA to the WTI permit as
Co-Permittee. They request a review of Region V's decision. West Virginia
and Pittsburgh also appeal approval of spray dryer
change. |
| Mar 5, 1992 | COLUMBUS -- 'Bed' action in front of Ohio State House. |
| Mar, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- National Governor's Association, in
conjunction with the U.S. EPA issues report, Hazardous Waste
Management In The States: A Review of the Capacity Assurance Process,
which indicates that there is a 70% over capacity nationally for
the disposal of hazardous waste. |
| Feb 27, 1992 |
CHICAGO -- Note to Misty Parsons Ohio EPA from John Gaitskill, U.S. EPA: "[E]mission
limits in chapter 18 apply. It appears the scrubber must maintain at
least 96.7% removal efficiency to prevent >250 T/Yr SO2. RCRA
documents say 98.8% control will be achieved, but the European examples
say < 90%." Paul Christowsky expert witness testifying under
oath on behalf of WTI in Oct. 1992 said that best achievable removal
efficiency for the scrubber would be 80% to 90%.) |
| Feb 15,
1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Pete Seeger celebration concert/fundraiser. |
| Feb 14,
1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Conclusion of a four day jury trial in which the "necessity
defense" was raised for 31 citizens charged with criminal trespass
for climbing over the fence between WTI and the access road on Oct
13, 1991. The jury found the 31 citizens "not guilty"; the harm
they sought to prevent was imminent and much greater than the harm
caused by the act of trespass. |
| Feb 3, 1992 | CHICAGO, IL -- U.S. EPA issues RCRA permit
(including approval for a spray dryer) to WTI and Columbiana
County Port Authority over CCPA's objections. |
| Feb 1, 1992 | CANTON, NY -- "Who owns WTI? How close is WTI to BCCI?," Waste Not, Feb, 1992. |
| Feb, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- EPA
preliminary reassessment of dioxin. Findings indicate: -
Current exposure levels to dioxins appear to place people at or near
body burden where sensitive responses such as reproductive, behavioral
and immune system effects occur.
- Dioxin does cause cancer in
humans.
- Cancer may not be the most sensitive toxic response
resulting from dioxin exposure.
- Immunotoxicity and
reproductive effects appear to occur at body burdens that are
approximately 100 times lower than those associated with
cancer.
- There may not be a threshold for certain responses to
dioxin.
- Sensitivity to humans is similar to that of experimental
animals.
- Dioxin exposure may have been responsible for the decline
of Lake Trout in Lake Ontario as a result of reproductive toxicity of
dioxin.
|
| Jan 30, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- J. Michael Kapp, Attorney for the CCPA
responds to U.S. EPA letter of Dec 20, 1991 notifying the U.S. EPA
that the CCPA did not wish to be named as
Co-permittee. |
| Jan 30, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- Citizens reveal transfer of WTI ownership. |
| Jan 20, 1992 | WASHINGTON, DC -- Von Roll President Blake Marshall writes Associate Director office of Cabinet Affairs, James Fitzhenry, The White House, saying, among other things: "As discussed last week, we would appreciate whatever assistance you
can provide in dealing with the EPA staff. In particular, we would
encourage: 1. Serious consideration by Region V of a 180 day temporary authorization to operate the spray dryer, as provided for in 40 CFR 270.42 (e) (a detailed request for such authorization has been submitted to Region V); 2. No rejection by Region V of the class 1 permit change for the evaporative quench operation (which has been requested by WTI); and 3. Prompt review by Director Reilly's office of any administrative
appeals of the spray dryer approval when it is finally issued by
Region V. We want to resolve this matter amicably, we would rather
work with U.S. EPA cooperatively, but we are facing extinction as a
consequence of Region V's inexplicable posture. Because Ohio has
mandated the spray dryer technology, we cannot return to the
original, permitted design. Because Region V will not allow us to
build and operate the spray dryer, we cannot implement the state's
mandate. We cannot go forward, we cannot go back. We need your
help." |
| Jan 9, 1992 | EAST LIVERPOOL -- After having been
warned numerous times by U.S. EPA, WTI proceeds with unauthorized
construction and installation of spray dryer equipment. Fined $129,000
by U.S. EPA. |
| |
|
|