![]() |
| ||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() | ||||||||||||
| » OR Search By Biz Name, Location | |||||
|
|
INSIDE News » The Plain Dealer » Newsflash » Weather » Traffic » Obituaries » Opinion » Business » Crime » Politics » Education
|
![]()
| |||||||||||||||||
News
FirstEnergy's political largess exceeds legal limits
10/18/02
Washington - FirstEnergy Corp., the Akron-based utility that owns the
troubled Davis-Besse nuclear power plant, has been way too generous in
giving money to members of Congress - exceeding by at least $15,000 the
limits allowed for contributions, a review of campaign records shows. Such excess benevolence, which can be illegal unless corrected, is
"rare," says Matt Keller, legislative director for watchdog group Common
Cause. FirstEnergy acknowledged in an interview with The Plain Dealer that
it had made "mistakes" in giving too much money. Partly in response to recent Federal Election Commission questions
about some of the contributions, FirstEnergy's PAC is asking politicians
to refund the sums that exceeded the $5,000 per-election federal legal
limit. It wants back: $2,000 from Sen. George Voinovich, who so far has received $7,000 from
the company for his primary campaign in 2004. A Voinovich spokesman said
the senator's re-election campaign sent the refund Oct. 11. $3,000 from Rep. Tom Sawyer, the lame-duck congressman from Akron who
got $8,000 from FirstEnergy for his recent primary. "I couldn't believe it
happened," Sawyer campaign aide Mike Fraioli said of receiving too much
money. "We're just looking into the records here. Unless somebody's math
is wrong, they're going to get their money back." $7,000 from Sen. Robert Torricelli, a New Jersey Democrat, who got
$12,000 from FirstEnergy for his successful primary campaign, then quit
the race amid worries that he would lose in November. FirstEnergy drafted
a letter asking Torricelli's campaign for the refund. "It just hasn't gone
out yet, because we're in the midst of doing just what you're doing, which
is auditing our PAC contributions," said FirstEnergy spokesman Ralph
DiNicola. The requested refunds are in addition to the $1,000 that FirstEnergy's
PAC got back in May from Sen. Bob Smith of New Hampshire, and another
$1,000 from Rep. John Dingell of Michigan in July. It's also on top of the $1,000 refund FirstEnergy's PAC got last year
from Leadership PAC 2000, a political organization controlled by Rep.
Michael Oxley of Findlay. In that case, FirstEnergy exceeded the limit of
giving $5,000 a year to another PAC. "The bottom line with all this is, we are in the process of putting
procedures in to try to minimize these kinds of mistakes," DiNicola said.
"We certainly weren't trying to hide anything." Companies use political action committees, gathering contributions from
employees, to support members of Congress who share political and economic
viewpoints. The money helps selected challengers in districts in which the
company does business, and helps companies gain access to lawmakers on
important legislative or regulatory matters. FirstEnergy - whose PAC has
reported giving $138,000 to federal candidates in the current election
cycle - lobbies on energy deregulation, nuclear waste and industry issues,
power plant and pollution regulation, and national energy policy, lobbying
reports filed with the U.S. Senate show. It is unclear how the company, as well as the politicians receiving the
contributions, failed to notice it was exceeding the $5,000 limits.
Politicians and the PAC file separate reports with the FEC that list
receipts and disbursements, and the individual contributions - often made
in several increments over the course of a campaign - can be easily
tallied. "That's what a mistake is - that somebody doesn't notice what to
somebody else like yourself, looking at it after the fact, is obvious,"
DiNicola said. Several representatives of the Congress members who received too much
money responded similarly. The Sawyer campaign did not notice it had
received too much money from FirstEnergy "because we're human," said
Fraioli. But organizations that follow money and influence in politics don't buy
that. "That's their job," said Keller, of Common Cause. "It's the law and
they're lawmakers, and they're supposed to comply with the law." "It is the most basic kind of record keeping," said Paul Sanford,
director of FEC Watch, a project at the Center for Responsive Politics.
Referring to the people running the FirstEnergy PAC, he said, "Blowing
this is not a good sign. PACs are supposed to be familiar with the law.
That's what they do." To reach this Plain Dealer reporter: skoff@plaind.com, 216-999-4212
| |||||||||||||||||||
About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Help/Feedback | Advertise With Us © 2002 cleveland.com. All Rights Reserved. | |||||||||||||||||||