Home     News     Communities     Classifieds     Cars     Jobs     Customer Service
 
Home
News
  Local News
  Local Sports
  Nation/World
  Ohio News
  Obituaries
  Opinion
  Technology
  Space & Science
  Weather
 
Communities
Classifieds
Cars
Jobs
Customer Service
Network Newspapers
  The Advocate, Newark
  Chillicothe Gazette
  Coshocton Tribune
  Lancaster
  Eagle-Gazette
  The Marion Star
  News Journal, Mansfield
  The News-Messenger, Fremont
  Telegraph-Forum, Bucyrus
  Times Recorder, Zanesville

  Saturday, November 16, 2002

 Local News


D-B officials mull reactor head leak detection system
Nuclear power industry


Staff writer


CARROLL TOWNSHIP -- FirstEnergy officials announced at a recent meeting they are looking into a leak detection system to install on the reactor head at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station.

That system, however, will do little good without skeptical minds behind it, say Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials.

The equipment being investigated by FirstEnergy would confirm evidence of what's called pressure boundary leakage -- or leakage from the walls of the reactor head.

"I think panel members agreed the key change has to be not in technology, but in creating a more safety-conscious environment," said NRC spokeswoman Viktoria Mitlyng, referring to the NRC panel that is overseeing Davis-Besse's progress.

"They need to encourage workers to take a deeper look at problems and look at causes, rather than rush through quick fixes."

The system wouldn't have helped in the utility's current situation, which was caused by leakage from a nozzle on top of the reactor head.

The plant has been off-line since February because of the leakage, which ate away a football-sized hole in the head's steel.

In that instance, workers at Davis-Besse were well aware there was leakage, they just didn't know where it was coming from. And according to NRC regulations, a certain amount of leakage is allowed if the source is not identified.

"Without taking that kind of in-depth look, they wouldn't have be able to discover the leakage and degradation, even with this system in place," Mitlyng confirmed.

And FirstEnergy officials have admitted, too, that safety was not top priority at the plant, and they are trying to take drastic steps to change policies to encourage an improved safety culture.

That being said, both NRC and FirstEnergy officials think the equipment could be a benefit in detecting future leaks.

"We're kind of in the investigation stage, although we've pretty much decided to install that," said company spokesman Richard Wilkins, who added installation likely won't occur until late 2003 or early 2004.

A price tag is yet unknown, although Wilkins said it wouldn't push the company over the $400 million it estimates the current outage will cost.

"There are some plants in Europe and Canada that have this system, but there are none in the United States that have it," he said. "We would be the first ones in the country that would do that."

Originally published Saturday, November 16, 2002

Home | News | Communities | Classifieds | Cars | Jobs | Customer Service


    Contact Us | Subscribe | Place an ad
Copyright ©2002 News Herald. All rights reserved.
Use of this site indicates your agreement to the Terms of Service
(Terms updated 08/10/01)