New York Times National
The New York Times
Home
Classifieds
Find a Job
Post a Job
Real Estate
Automobiles
All Classifieds
News
International
National
- Columns
Politics
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Special: A Nation
Challenged
Special: Winter Olympics
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Automobiles
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Photos
College
Learning Network
Job Market
Real Estate
Special:
NYT @ 150
Services
Archive
Help Center
NYT Mobile
NYT Store
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Newspaper
  Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Your Profile
Review Profile
E-Mail Options
Log Out
Text Version
search Click for 7 Day Free Trial Welcome, paulryder1  
Sign Up for Newsletters  |  Log Out
  
Go to Advanced Search
E-Mail This Article Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles

 

December 25, 2001

Report Faults Fiscal Review of Nuclear Plants

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON, Dec. 24 (AP) — The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has failed to adequately ensure that owners have enough money to safely own, operate and later decommission nuclear power plants, a Congressional review says.

The commission needs to tighten its review of requests to transfer licenses, especially because the costs of dismantling a plant and disposing of radioactive waste could increase, said the study by the General Accounting Office, the investigative arm of Congress.

The review was requested by Representative Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, because of concerns that deregulation and recent license transfers have reduced money available for decommissioning a plant, which costs $300 million to $400 million.

The regulatory commission has licensed 125 nuclear power plants for limited times. Utilities have sold or are selling all or part of 15 plants. Another 30 plants have had licenses transferred.

Before transferring licenses to new plant owners, the commission requires companies to make periodic deposits into a trust fund; prepay costs; or obtain a bond, insurance or credit to guarantee they can meet certain financial requirements.

In general, enough money is being set aside to take plants out of service, the report said, but the commission has not done enough to monitor the financial arrangements.

The commission's "reviews were not always rigorous enough to ensure that decommissioning funds would be adequate," it said. "Moreover, N.R.C. did not always adequately verify the new owners' financial qualifications to safely own and operate the plants."

The commission should ask for guarantees of additional revenue and document its review of any financial information, including revenue projections, the report said.

It also said the commission gave plant owners about two years before their licenses are terminated to determine whether additional cleanup was needed. The accounting office recommended shortening that time.

But the commission said an earlier deadline "would not add significant value to the decommissioning process." It also disagreed that it should modify its financial reviews "because many of the proposed license transfers are unique."



Home | Back to National | Search | Help Back to Top


E-Mail This Article Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles


Advertiser Links

"Stop Smoking"
Advertising Feature




Find More Low Fares!
Experience Orbitz!



Reprints & Permissions Click here to order Reprints or Permissions of this Article

Click Here to receive an introductory offer to The New York Times Electronic Edition.


Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company | Privacy Information