![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| » OR Search By Biz Name, Location | |||||
|
|
INSIDE News » The Plain Dealer » Newsflash » Weather » Traffic » Obituaries » Opinion » Business » Crime » Politics » Education
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
News
Fact-finders may take look at Davis-Besse 10/29/02
Washington- The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's five-member governing
board is considering holding a rare fact-finding hearing of its own
because of the unprecedented corrosion damage that has shuttered the
Davis-Besse nuclear plant for eight months. The commissioners are also considering changing the way they oversee
commercial reactors, in the wake of the Davis-Besse debacle. Top NRC officials revealed the developments yesterday during the first
day of a three-day annual nuclear safety conference. The session was
dominated by discussion of the problems at the Toledo-area plant, which
continue to force federal regulators and the nuclear industry to rethink
assumptions about the durability and maintenance of the massive lids atop
the nation's nuclear reactors. Davis-Besse "leads us down a path that says here's an area where we
don't know as much as we thought," said Larry Mathews, chairman of a
nuclear industry group studying why the nozzles in the lid are prone to
cracking and leaking of the reactor's coolant. "The whole world is learning from these issues." Commissioners Jeffrey Merrifield and Nils Diaz, two of the NRC's five
governors, said the commission will decide within the next several weeks
whether to conduct an extraordinary meeting in which the agency, plant
owner FirstEnergy Corp. and industry observers would review the factors
that led to the pineapple-sized hole in the 6½-inch-thick steel lid. While
the NRC staff continues to hold regular meetings on Davis-Besse, this
would be the first time the commissioners have taken up the matter. "I personally think it would be a good thing," Diaz said in an
interview after addressing the safety conference attended by as many as
400 representatives of industry, government and universities. Merrifield said the timing of such a hearing would depend on the
progress of several agency investigations, including an inquiry into
possible criminal wrongdoing by FirstEnergy in its successful campaign
last fall to persuade the NRC to postpone a mandatory shutdown of
Davis-Besse for a safety inspection. Investigators are trying to determine
if FirstEnergy altered or withheld documents that would have shown the
true condition of the lid. Both commissioners and William Travers, the NRC's executive director
for operations, defended the agency management's decision to allow the
plant to keep operating, despite the staff's near certainty that
Davis-Besse's lid was cracked and leaking. "We made the appropriate judgment there," Travers said. "We'd all like
to have more information. I'd like to have known that corrosion was
occurring." In the wake of a highly critical assessment by the agency of its
oversight of Davis-Besse in the years leading up to the discovery this
March of the rust hole, Travers said he has asked senior NRC managers to
recommend changes in the way the agency operates. Travers said he expects the group's report within weeks. He then could
submit its findings to the commission for approval. The NRC has not decided whether or when to allow Davis-Besse to resume
making electricity. FirstEnergy is installing a new lid and making
extensive repairs and improvements with the hope of restarting early next
year. Davis-Besse, along with other nuclear reactors where cracking and
coolant leaks have recently been found, has spawned a major research
effort to understand more about how cracks form, how fast they grow and
how the leaking turns into a corrosive force. At the time the rust hole was discovered at Davis-Besse, "there was a
good deal of fundamental degradation rate data and corrosion rate data . .
. that just simply did not exist," said William Cullen, senior materials
engineer for the NRC. The industry and the agency are each working on computer models that
attempt to predict when and under what conditions cracks and corrosion
will form and worsen. Those models disagree in some significant ways and
are not yet ready to be used by the NRC for guidance. The NRC's policy is that thorough, regular visual checks of the reactor
lids are adequate to spot signs of leaking early enough to prevent major
corrosion damage like that at Davis-Besse. However, recent inspections
findings at several nuclear plants have shaken that confidence and are
forcing the NRC and the industry to reconsider whether instrument-aided
exams are warranted. Regarding Davis-Besse, the NRC is employing two government labs to go
beyond computer modeling. At Argonne, near Chicago, scientists are
considering making a mockup of the rust hole to study corrosion growth.
And at Oak Ridge, near Knoxville, Tenn., engineers are planning to test a
replica of the thin stainless-steel liner, which was all that kept
Davis-Besse's coolant from spewing out of the reactor. The lab will
measure the pressure needed to burst the metal, which was bulging, cracked
and thinner than expected. FirstEnergy will pay for that research, said Cullen. To reach these Plain Dealer reporters: jmangels@plaind.com, 216-999-4842 jfunk@plaind.com, 216-999-4138 skoff@plaind.com, 216-999-4212
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
About Us | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Help/Feedback | Advertise With Us © 2002 cleveland.com. All Rights Reserved. | ||||||||||||||||||||||