The New York Times Opinion
The New York Times
Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
- Columns
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
New York Today
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia/Photos
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
Go to Advanced Search/ArchiveGo to Advanced Search/ArchiveSymbol Lookup
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  Welcome, paulryder1
December 12, 2002

Danger at Indian Point

Recent Articles

Report Finds Security Flaws at Indian Point (December 8, 2002)



Topics

 Alerts
Atomic Energy
Terrorism
Create Your Own | Manage Alerts
Sign Up for Newsletters

To the Editor:

The report about serious, continuing security lapses at the Indian Point nuclear power plant (news article, Dec. 8) is alarming because it refutes past assurances from the New York State Office of Public Security and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Last December, James K. Kallstrom, head of the state office, even taunted terrorists to try an attack on the plant, saying, "Let 'em try." He added, "That may be one way of flushing them out."

Mr. Kallstrom made this statement just before a security consultant for the plant owner documented that 81 percent of the guard force believed that they could not successfully defend the plant after 9/11.

Worse yet is the attitude of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. It has still not upgraded its regulations for defending nuclear plants. One commissioner, Edward McGaffigan Jr., said he was happy to stand shoulder to shoulder by Mr. Kallstrom's perspective.  
PAUL LEVENTHAL
Chevy Chase, Md., Dec. 8, 2002
The writer is president emeritus, Nuclear Control Institute.




THREATS AND RESPONSES: ANTITERRORISM; Little Headway In Terror War, Democrats Say  (November 15, 2002)  $

THREATS AND RESPONSES: GAPS IN SECURITY; Report Finds U.S. Unprepared for Next Terrorist Attack  (October 25, 2002)  $

THREATS AND RESPONSES: ASSESSING RISKS; Split on Nuclear Plants: Weak Spot or Fortress?  (October 24, 2002)  $

THREATS AND RESPONSES: REACTOR VULNERABILITY; Experts Say Nuclear Plants Can Survive Jetliner Crash  (September 20, 2002)  $

Find more results for Atomic Energy and Terrorism .



Doing research? Search the archive for more than 500,000 articles:




E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles


Home | Back to Opinion | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top

Copyright The New York Times Company | Permissions | Privacy Policy
E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles