WSJ.com OpinionJournal
BEST OF THE WEB TODAY
Dog tosser expands his rap sheet,
earns distinction of being world's
dumbest criminal!
Click here!
Contents On the Editorial Page Reader Responses
Taste
Contents
On The Editorial Page
Today's Featured Article
Also on WSJ.com
International Opinion
Best Of The Web Today
E-mail Updates
Political Diary
Amanda.Bright@home
Reader Responses
How Others See U.S.
Our Favorite Sites
Special Features
Archives
Columnists
Robert Bartley
Thomas Bray
Pete du Pont
Paul Gigot
Collin Levey
Seth Lipsky
Richard Miniter
Peggy Noonan
Dorothy Rabinowitz
Claudia Rosett
Kim Strassel
T. Varadarajan
About Us
Our Philosophy
Who We Are
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Contact Us
Subscribe WSJ
How To Advertise

search
go
OpinionJournal
Wall Street
Journal Online



 
 


Wall Street Journal
CareerJournal
CollegeJournal
StartupJournal
WSJbooks.com
subscribe to wsj subscribe to wsj.com

[Advertisement]  

Today's Featured Article

FEATURED ARTICLE

Academic Meltdown
The number of nuclear engineers isn't exactly mushrooming.

BY SAMUEL GOLDMAN
Thursday, July 26, 2001 12:01 a.m. EDT

After decades of neglect, nuclear power may be back. The California energy crisis has raised awareness of how dependent the economy is on cheap and plentiful energy, while concerns about carbon emissions have spurred a search for nonpolluting alternatives. The Bush administration's energy proposals include plans for the first new nuclear generating plants in years and license extensions for existing facilities.

But the restoration of nuclear power is threatened by the decline of the academic infrastructure that supports the technology. Across the country, university programs in nuclear science and engineering are seeing their funding cut, their faculty dispersed, their laboratories padlocked. There are already too few qualified nuclear engineers to meet current demand. If we lose the ability to train their successors--and to produce the theoretical innovations that have made America the discipline's international leader--a nuclear renaissance will be impossible to achieve.

This May, Cornell University decided to close its nuclear teaching reactor and relocate its staff, capping a national trend that has seen a dozen universities take similar steps since the mid-1980s. "Because of the public perception after Three Mile Island and Chernobyl that anything nuclear is dangerous," says Kenan Unlu, the director of the Cornell reactor, "we are losing an educated workforce very quickly."

As recently as 1988, there were 40 research reactors nationwide. Now there are only 28. Cornell's 500-kilowatt General Atomics TRIGA II, the centerpiece of its Ward Center for the Nuclear Sciences, was the last in New York state. When it finally ceases operation next year, there will be none left in the Ivy League. Even before the decision to close the Ward Center, Cornell's nuclear engineering department had been disbanded.

The fate of the Cornell program, which was reduced to offering to share its apparatus with the geology and art history departments, is not unique. A 1997 Department of Energy survey found only 570 students nationwide majoring in nuclear engineering, down nearly a thousand from five years earlier. Most experts in the field, who entered the discipline in the heroic early days of nuclear research, are now approaching retirement, including three-quarters of the workforce in the national laboratory system.

At the University of Michigan, which decided last fall to decommission its nuclear reactor, use of the facility has been declining for years as faculty retire without being replaced. A.E. Waltar, the director of Texas A&M's nuclear engineering program, says, "This was the place to be when I started in this field in the '60s. But with the bad rap that the word 'nuclear' has had, even interested students get discouraged. They tell mom and dad what they're doing and, their parents say, 'You're going into a dead-end field.' "

What accounts for the decline in nuclear research? Part of it is due to the concerted antinuclear campaign by environmentalists, who should actually be attracted to this ecologically friendly energy. But Greenpeace's Web site claims that "every nuclear power plant has the capacity for a meltdown that could poison millions of square miles with radiation and kill hundreds of thousands of people."

Thanks in part to this propaganda blitz, a general impression has formed that nuclear energy has been tried, has failed and is on the way out. There is a whole genre of popular entertainment based on the danger of playing with atoms. We're not talking about "The China Syndrome" here--try "Class of Nuke 'Em High 3: The Good, the Bad and the Subhumanoid," a cheesy 1994 exploitation flick.

Add this to the popular association of nuclear science with nuclear war, and it is not difficult to understand why students have been wary of the subject. This, despite the fact that the nuclear industry offers great job prospects. There are roughly three positions available for each recent graduate, and Mr. Waltar says that his students earn the highest average starting salary of any in the university--about $55,000. If President Bush's energy plans go through, the opportunities will be even better.

Foreign students could fill some of these jobs, but getting work permits isn't easy, and many of those who come to study in the U.S. return to their home countries, which often have thriving nuclear programs of their own.

Congress is belatedly awakening to the problem. After years of declining support, the Department of Energy increased the federal subsidy for Cornell's nuclear program from $3,000 in 1997-98 to $620,000 in 2000-01, although too late to save the reactor. And there are bills in both houses to increase funding for nuclear education programs by $200 million over five years. But if existing campus reactors close it's hard to imagine, given the prevailing political climate, how new ones can ever be built--no matter how much money Congress appropriates. "Once these decisions are made," says Mr. Walter of Texas A&M, "it is very difficult to go back."

Mr. Goldman, a student at Rutgers, is working at The Wall Street Journal this summer.

RESPOND TO THIS ARTICLE     READ RESPONSES

E-MAIL THIS TO A FRIEND     PRINT FRIENDLY FORMAT

BOOKMARK THIS SITE

HOME     TOP OF PAGE


July 26, 2001
7:26am EDT

 
[Advertisement]

   dow jones


[Advertisement]