CLEAR
52°
more weather




Wednesday,
November 20, 2002

 



Tips on searching


Browse Last 30 Days
The Blade Archives
AP Archives


Latest News
Sports
Business
Arts & Entertainment
Davis-Besse In-depth
Opinion
Religion
Health & Science
Columnists
Obituaries
Special Reports
Weather
AP Wire
Photos of the Day
Lottery


General
Homes
Autos
Jobs
Boats/Recreation
Celebrations
Legal Notices
Directory of Worship
Personals

Events Calendar
Educational Services
Directories
Forums
E-thepeople
TV Listings
Movie Showtimes
Horoscopes


toledo
HBA Parade of Homes
Contests
KidZone
Mud Hens Web Cam


Set As Homepage
Subscriber Services
Email Newsletter
The Blade e-edition
Advertise
About Us
Contact Us
Help & FAQs

Local Companies | Article published November 20, 2002
FirstEnergy bid brings concern for deregulation

By DAVID PATCH
BLADE STAFF WRITER


A FirstEnergy Corp. proposal to reduce the rate discount granted to customers who buy their electricity from other suppliers has local officials worried that burgeoning electricity competition in the region will be undermined.

The Akron utility, parent company to Toledo Edison, has asked the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio for permission to reduce its "shopping credit" from about 4.6 cents per kilowatt-hour to about 4.2 cents.

Ralph DiNicola, a FirstEnergy spokesman, said the change has been proposed because the current credit to consumers who use electricity generated by competing firms effectively creates a subsidy for those firms.

But Harry Barlos, a Lucas County commissioner and spokesman for the Northwest Ohio Aggregation Coalition, said PUCO approval of FirstEnergy’s application would effectively wipe out the $20 to $30 annual electric-bill savings that Toledo area residents had been led to expect from participating in a power-buying pool.

"This action would be a stake right in the middle of the heart" of electricity competition in northern Ohio, Mr. Barlos said.

Mr. Barlos and other NOAC leaders have scheduled a news conference for 10:30 a.m. today at Government Center to detail their objections to the FirstEnergy rate application. Toledo Mayor Jack Ford and Peter Gerken, chairman of Toledo City Council’s utilities committee, also are scheduled to participate.

Last year, Toledo contracted with FirstEnergy Solutions, an unregulated FirstEnergy subsidiary, to supply electricity to its aggregated electricity consumers at a rate of 4.35 cents per kilowatt hour. In doing so, the city split off from NOAC, a consortium of seven suburban communities and Lucas County, which negotiated a similar price from WPS, Inc., of Green Bay, Wis., to supply electricity.

Under deregulation, electricity has been broken down into three components: generation, transmission, and distribution. Only generation has been opened to competition in Ohio; the transmission lines and distribution facilities FirstEnergy and other utilities operate here continue to be operated as regulated monopolies.

By reducing the generation credit deducted from Toledo Edison bills to customers of WPS or FirstEnergy Solutions, FirstEnergy effectively would raise the transmission and distribution charge to those customers, said Mark Frye, president of Palmer Energy, a consultant who has worked with local officials on their aggregation plans. Still paying 4.35 cents per kilowatt-hour to their suppliers, those customers would end up paying more for electricity than those who continue with Toledo Edison’s regulated-rate service, he said.

"What we’re likely to see is a mass exodus from the market provisions" of deregulation, Mr. Frye said.

Mr. DiNicola said, however, the nearly 850,000 customers of FirstEnergy’s three Ohio utilities who have joined aggregation groups or otherwise begun "shopping" for power represent about 40 percent of its previous 2 million customers, more than twice the participation rate that the Ohio legislature anticipated when it enacted deregulation.

He said the reduced "shopping credit" still provides a 1-cent-per-kilowatt-hour spread between FirstEnergy’s rate and the bargain rate the utility agreed to offer on a pool of electricity it is selling to other suppliers to stimulate local competition.

"Our goal here is to balance the ability of the customer to shop with not having them subsidizing our competition," Mr. DiNicola said.


More articles on this subject »
FirstEnergy reworks nuclear power unit 11/20/2002
February start is FirstEnergy goal for Besse 11/14/2002
No source found for reactor stains 11/01/2002
Nuclear plants told to give up more data 10/31/2002
Expert wonders if rust unique to Davis-Besse 10/31/2002

Article Features »
Printer-friendly version
Forum on this topic
Email to a friend
View the Business index
AP Wall Street News »
Index Last Change
Dow 8623.01 +148.23
Nasdaq 1419.35 +44.84
S&P 500 914.15 +17.41
Quick Quotes
Subcategories »
Agriculture

Automobiles

Employment

Local Companies

Personal Finance

Real Estate

Regional Economy

Stock Market

Technology

Unions







SHARE YOUR MEMORIES AND WIN!
Click here!

WINNERS LIST
Click here!





©2002 The Blade. Privacy Statement. By using this service, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement: Please read it.

The Toledo Blade Company, 541 N. Superior St., Toledo, OH 43660, (419) 724-6000
To contact a specific department or an individual person, click here.