FirstEnergy and Davis-Besse Engineer Geisen convicted in cover-up TOLEDO -- "The sentencing of former Davis-Besse engineer David Geisen has been postponed to May 1. It had been set for April 17.
Geisen, of DePere, Wis., was convicted Oct. 30 in U.S. District Court in Toledo on three of five counts of deception in a case that centered around the roles he and two others were accused of having in a cover-up at FirstEnergy Corp.’s Davis-Besse nuclear plant nearly seven years ago... Prosecutors allege the cover-up kept the Nuclear Regulatory Commission from finding out that Davis-Besse’s old reactor head was about to burst and cause radioactive steam to form, endangering northern Ohio," Toledo Blade.
Mar 28: Ohio Consumers' Counsel says FirstEnergy's rate increase request should be reduced by $300 million Proposes new investigation of service reliability COLUMBUS -- "A proposed distribution rate increase by FirstEnergy should be cut by at least $300 million and a new investigation is needed to address the utility's service reliability, according to the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel (OCC). The OCC proposes that the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) order a comprehensive review of FirstEnergy reliability practices. The review would include the determination of measures to increase reliability and/or penalties against FirstEnergy," press release, Ohio Consumers' Counsel. Mar 21: Judge likely to delay sentencing engineer in reactor-leak case TOLEDO -- "October’s split-decision verdict in the conspiracy case involving former Davis-Besse engineer David Geisen seemed to indicate the jury struggled in reaching a consensus about his role in FirstEnergy Corp.’s cover-up, U.S. District Judge David Katz said while addressing a federal prosecutor in a South Florida courtroom yesterday. 'You have to admit it would seem that by not finding Mr. Geisen guilty on two counts, the jury was showing how close its decision was and perhaps was throwing Mr. Geisen a bone,' Judge Katz told Thomas Ballantine, one of three U.S. Department of Justice prosecutors who tried the month-long case in Toledo against Geisen and his co-defendant, Rodney N. Cook, of Millington, Tenn. Geisen was a FirstEnergy supervisor who oversaw Davis-Besse’s old reactor head. Mr. Cook was a contractor the utility hired to write reports it submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Feb 23: Two former nuclear plant workers file lawsuits
OAK HARBOR -- "FirstEnergy Corp.'s Davis-Besse nuclear plant is making electricity again and is expected to be back at full power within days, the utility said yesterday... The latest restart effort began Thursday. The plant went offline for normal refueling and maintenance Dec. 30. FirstEnergy tried putting it back into service on Feb. 1 but never synchronized to the grid because of excessive vibrations from the plant's turbine generator, which had been sent to a contractor in Chicago to be rebuilt," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Jan 28: Convicted Davis-Besse engineer is seeking new trial Case will be heard in Florida TOLEDO-- "Former Davis-Besse nuclear engineer David Geisen's bid to get his conviction thrown out will be argued in a South Florida courtroom. Judge David Katz, of U.S. District Court in Toledo, who winters in Florida, has scheduled a hearing for 11 a.m. March 20 in the Paul G. Rogers Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in West Palm Beach... Geisen, of DePere, Wis., was convicted Oct. 30 on three of five deception charges by a jury that deliberated more than 26 hours after hearing evidence for nearly a month. Prosecutors claimed he was part of a FirstEnergy Corp. cover-up that misled the Nuclear Regulatory Commission about Davis-Besse's dangerous operating condition in the fall of 2001," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Jan 14: Davis-Besse takes steps to improve performance TOLEDO -- "Kudos to Davis-Besse: Just yesterday, it seemed, I was in Washington hearing Harold Denton describe the 2002 near-rupture of Davis-Besse's old reactor head as 'the second-most important event in the history of [U.S.] nuclear safety.'
Harold who? He was Jimmy Carter's right-hand man from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission during the Three Mile Island saga in 1979... FirstEnergy Corp., to its credit, is trying to make us forget about both events with more than corporate spin," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Published January 13. TOLEDO -- Engineer to be sentenced April 17 over Davis-Besse, Toledo Blade. Jan 11: Agency urging rate drop for utility Consumer group against Ohio Edison increase COLUMBUS -- "Ohio Edison customers should be getting a decrease in distribution rates instead of a proposed increase, a consumer watchdog agency said in testimony filed Thursday... The company said it had not asked for an increase in distribution rates for Ohio Edison customers since 1990 and the other two companies since 1997. It is asking for $340 million in annual revenue increases for its three operating companies. But the Ohio consumers' counsel, the state's residential utility advocate, on Thursday filed paperwork with the PUCO saying its analysis shows the utility should decrease distribution rates for Ohio Edison and CEI and only slightly increase rates for Toledo Edison," Betty Lin-Fisher, Akron Beacon Journal. COLUMBUS -- Watchdog agency backs increase by FirstEnergy, Toledo Blade. COLUMBUS -- Consumers' advocate calls FirstEnergy rate increase unreasonable, Jay Miller, Crain's Cleveland Business. Jan 8, 2008: Radioactive water seeps from pipe leak at Davis-Besse nuclear plant
OAK HARBOR -- "Radioactive coolant water seeped from a pipe in the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant's containment area Friday morning as an old weld was being reinforced with a metal overlay, FirstEnergy Corp. and federal officials said yesterday.... The Union of Concerned Scientists, a watchdog group based in Cambridge, Mass., said in a briefing issued by its Washington office yesterday that the repair at Davis-Besse could be 'relatively simple' if the lone discovered crack turns out to be the plant's only one.
'If not, the repairs and risk implications grow larger,' according to the paper, written by David Lochbaum, a former nuclear safety engineer and the group's nuclear safety project director," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade.
Dec 17: Ohio, Michigan running out of ways to store their radioactive waste But closing of S.C. landfill isn't sounding alarms yet
TOLEDO -- "Michigan and Ohio are among 36 states that will have a greater buildup of radioactive waste after July 1 if a South Carolina landfill follows through with its plans to start turning them away... Low-level radioactive waste runs the gamut from medical clothing to nuclear tubing, virtually everything with radiation other than spent fuel that's been pulled from reactor cores of nuclear plants such as FirstEnergy Corp.'s Davis-Besse in Ottawa County and DTE Energy's Fermi 2 in Monroe County," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Published December 16.
Nov 29: Water system problem forces shutdown of Ohio nuclear plant NORTH PERRY -- "A water system problem caused an automatic shutdown of a nuclear power plant Wednesday, a spokeswoman for the plant said. The Perry Nuclear Power Plant, located alongside Lake Erie about 35 miles northeast of Cleveland, shut down about 7:30 a.m. when problems with the system that provides water to the reactor malfunctioned, said spokeswoman Jennifer Young. Water level inside the reactor was adequately maintained, but the plant remained off-line Wednesday evening,” Young said," Associated Press.
Nov 6: May trial planned for 3rd defendant in Davis-Besse case
Nov 5: FirstEnergy pays to be heard in electric-rate debate COLUMBUS -- "The debate over how Ohio will control your electric bill for years to come is fueled by green.
The state's three largest power companies have doled out a quarter of a million dollars in campaign contributions to legislators and state political funds this year even though nobody's up for election...
'We participate in the political process, as a lot of companies do, and particularly related to issues that are important to our company and our shareholders and customers and employees,' said Ellen Raines, FirstEnergy's public-relations director. 'The energy policy in Ohio is certainly one of those issues,'" Mark Rollenhagen, Cleveland Plain Dealer. Published November 4.
Oct 31: Former engineer convicted; plant contractor acquitted in Davis-Besse cover-up trial
Oct 30: Judge urges jury to break deadlock in Davis-Besse nuclear trial
TOLEDO -- Davis-Besse watchdogs say NRC auditor needs funding, "A national watchdog group has cited Davis-Besse as an example of why the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's internal auditor needs better funding - especially if there is to be a nuclear renaissance," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Oct 27: Davis-Besse jurors end 2nd day without verdict TOLEDO -- "A second day of deliberations produced no verdict in the Davis-Besse criminal trial in U.S. District Court in Toledo, a case viewed by some as having potential ramifications for the nuclear industry’s work force. The jury is to reconvene Monday. It is weighing evidence of what former engineers David Geisen and Rodney N. Cook knew about the Ottawa County nuclear plant’s old reactor head in the fall of 2001. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission suspected something was wrong at the time, but FirstEnergy Corp. talked the agency out of serving the nation’s first mandatory shutdown order since 1987," Toledo Blade. Oct 26: Electric plan to lock in northern Ohio's higher rates Cost you're paying for power now could be 'floor' for future COLUMBUS -- "A new plan to set future electric rates in the state, keeping northern Ohio’s high rates, was unveiled yesterday in the Ohio Senate.
The plan, supported by Democratic Gov. Ted Stickland and Ohio Senate Republicans, would lock in the rates customers are paying for the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant and other utility investments in power-generating stations that otherwise would expire next year," Jim Provance, Toledo Blade. TOLEDO -- Davis-Besse criminal jury to deliberate again today, Toledo Blade. Oct 25: Davis-Besse engineers' fate rests with jury Trial summaries take hours TOLEDO -- "Defense attorneys said the government's conspiracy theory is implausible. Neither defendant had anything to gain from keeping Davis-Besse online, they said. Richard Hibey, one of Mr. Geisen's attorneys, accused the government of "importing all of this hindsight" and trying to present it as fact. The defendants followed procedures that were in effect at the time and their actions "should not be perverted into a lie, a cover-up, a covert act," he said. 'Why would he abandon his responsibility to science, his family, his employer, and the people [of Ohio] simply to keep Davis-Besse [online] another 45 days?' Mr. Hibey asked," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. MORE ON FIRSTENERGY Oct 24: Engineer says utility covered up problems Davis-Besse criminal trial drawing to close TOLEDO -- " In yesterday's concluding testimony, a FirstEnergy supervisor testified that he immediately saw evidence of a cover-up. Randy Rossomme, who now works in the utility's headquarters, was a quality-assurance supervisor at FirstEnergy's twin-reactor Beaver Valley nuclear complex in western Pennsylvania when the damage to Davis-Besse's reactor head was discovered in March, 2002. He said he was taken aback by documents he examined weeks later after the utility's nuclear subsidiary named him to an internal 'root cause' inspection team at Davis-Besse. 'My first gut response was they lied - they, being Davis-Besse,' Mr. Rossomme told the jury," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade.
TOLEDO -- "The government won't attempt to make former Davis-Besse engineer Andrew Siemaszko testify against his co-defendants during their trial in federal court in Toledo... Mr. Siemaszko was in charge of cleaning and inspecting Davis-Besse's old reactor head during the Ottawa County nuclear plant's 2000 refueling outage, the last one before the dangerous cavity at the heart of the case was found in early 2002," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Oct 20: Davis-Besse Trial Manager regrets role in 2002 event
TOLEDO -- "Mr. Geisen said his FirstEnergy colleagues thrust him into making a presentation before the NRC on short notice on Nov. 8, 2001. He wasn't prepared. He showed video footage of reactor-head inspections from 1996 and 1998 that he hadn't previewed. He didn't know what he was looking at, and the quality of the footage was so bad the NRC didn't bother looking at the tape from 2000 that Mr. Siemaszko had produced, he said. 'I was extremely frustrated because I couldn't answer the questions they were asking. I felt stupid. I was mad at my teammates because I felt they sent me into something unprepared,' Mr. Geisen said. FirstEnergy sent Mr. Siemaszko out to the NRC's headquarters about five weeks later, but only after an internal debate because Mr. Siemaszko's eastern European accent can be hard to understand, Mr. Geisen said," Tom Henry Toledo Blade. Oct 13: Prosecution rests in trial of 2 Davis-Besse workers TOLEDO -- "The government yesterday rested its case against two former Davis-Besse workers accused of covering up information about the Ottawa County nuclear plant's dangerous condition in the fall of 2001, when its old reactor head was on the verge of bursting and allowing radioactive steam to form. David Geisen of Wisconsin and Rodney N. Cook of Tennessee are both charged with lying to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, as is Andrew Siemaszko of Texas. All three face up to five years in prison and separate $250,000 fines if convicted," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Oct 12: Director assisted feds during Davis-Besse probe Engineer was targeted
Oct 11: Prosecutor may force defendant to testify in Davis-Besse trial TOLEDO -- "The government's case against three former Davis-Besse engineers took a bizarre twist at the end of yesterday's session in U.S. District Court when an angry defense attorney said his client, who is not on trial yet, may be forced to testify against the other two defendants. Chuck Boss of Maumee told Judge David Katz he fears his client, Andrew Siemaszko, now of Texas, will incriminate himself or be duped into committing perjury by Justice Department prosecutors if they are allowed to subpoena him as a witness in the trial of a former co-worker, David Geisen, now of Wisconsin, and Tennessee contractor Rodney N. Cook," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Oct 10: Davis-Besse witness set to testify against trio Engineer to discuss coverup accusation TOLEDO -- "One of the key witnesses in the U.S. Department of Justice's case against three former Davis-Besse engineers is expected to testify today about the government's theory that he and the trio were part of a coverup that jeopardized northern Ohio's safety in the fall of 2001. Prasoon Goyal, 61, of Toledo, who took the stand late yesterday, is a former senior design engineer who avoided prosecution by agreeing to cooperate with the Justice Department in its case against the other three," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Oct 8: Problems add up for Davis-Besse TOLEDO -- "A quick Davis-Besse recap: Six months before the plant's historic shutdown on Feb. 16, 2002 - long before news broke about the horrible state of its old reactor head - FirstEnergy Corp. put in an order for a new head, a $200 million part. That had never been done before in U.S. nuclear history. The utility said it was tired of worrying about cracked reactor-head nozzles, the original focus. It said it was just as blown away, bad pun intended, as everyone about the much more serious issue of acid burning through all but a fraction of the lid and nearly allowing radioactive steam to form," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Oct 5: Seeing justice served ![]() TOLEDO -- "Northwest Ohio did more than dodge a bullet when the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant was shut down in 2002, it avoided a potential nuclear disaster. And the best thing that could come out of the criminal trials of three former Davis-Besse workers would be a clearer picture of whether their bosses should have been sitting with them at the defense table. Former FirstEnergy employee David Geisen and contractor Rodney Cook are on trial in U.S. District Court in Toledo. They are accused of lying to the government in documents used by Toledo Edison's parent firm to argue against the Nuclear Regulatory Commission pulling the plug on the Ottawa County plant on Dec. 31, 2001, to fix a corroded reactor head," editorial, Toledo Blade. Oct 4: Residue on reactor should have been warning, court told TOLEDO -- "Jurors spent hours yesterday in U.S. District Court in Toledo reviewing footage of boric acid crystals that encrusted Davis-Besse's old reactor head as far back as 1996. Government prosecutors are using the evidence to bolster their claim that FirstEnergy Corp. engineers lied in maintenance documents the utility submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the fall of 2001. The trial, which began Monday, is the first of two in which former engineers face up to five years in prison and separate $250,000 fines if convicted of lying to the government," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Oct 3: Court told of failed bid to shut Davis-Besse NRC staffer doubted FirstEnergy's claims TOLEDO -- "Attorneys yesterday spent nearly six hours grilling a Nuclear Regulatory Commission staffer who fought to get Davis-Besse shut down in the fall of 2001 as a safeguard for northern Ohio, only to have his senior management override the recommendation he and his colleagues made so that FirstEnergy Corp. would not take a financial hit. Allen Hiser, now chief of the NRC's steam generator, tube integrity, and chemical engineering branch, said he wasn't buying FirstEnergy's assertion that Davis-Besse's old reactor head was properly cleaned and inspected during the plant's previous refueling outage in 2000," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Oct 2: Davis-Besse ex-workers called liars as trial begins TOLEDO -- "Opening arguments began yesterday in the first of two criminal trials involving former Davis-Besse workers with federal prosecutors accusing defendants David Geisen and Rodney N. Cook of being liars who were out to 'trick, scheme, or otherwise mislead' the Nuclear Regulatory Commission about the degree to which acid leaked from the plant’s nuclear reactor in the fall of 2001... Defense attorneys countered by saying their defendants are being used as scapegoats. 'Ladies and gentlemen, David Geisen is here today because the NRC was embarrassed by what happened at Davis-Besse,' said one of Mr. Geisen’s attorneys, Andrew Wise. 'This was not an investigation to figure out what happened, but who we can blame,'" Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Oct 2: High Energy lobbying targets electric bill legislation CLEVELAND -- "They showed up to fight over your electric bill. Nearly 100 of them, all with connections to Ohio lawmakers, some wielding Blackberrys, talking points, press releases and even an opinion poll. So many came that the meeting - the first hearing on Gov. Ted Strickland's energy plan - was delayed so it could be moved to a larger room in the Statehouse. Utility companies, manufacturers, unions, farmers and environmentalists hastened their representatives to Wednesday's meeting because Strickland's energy plan, introduced in the Ohio Senate, has unprecedented ramifications for Ohio consumers, the economy and the environment," Mark Naymik, Cleveland Plain Dealer. Oct 1: First of two trials in Davis-Besse case set to begin today in Toledo Former workers charged with lying about safety issues
Sep 20: Utility increases concern firms FirstEnergy assures businesses large jumps seem unlikely in '09 AKRON -- "How important are electric rates to a business? It would take a day to count the ways. More than 200 people, from business owners and executives to economists and engineers, attended the second Northern Ohio Energy Management Conference at the John S. Knight Convention Center in Akron on Wednesday... But the common thread throughout the event was the question of what will happen to electric rates on Jan. 1, 2009. That's when rate plans for three of Ohio's four investor-owned utilities including Akron-based FirstEnergy Corp. are set to expire," Paula Schleis, Akron Beacon Journal.Aug 30: FirstEnergy deferred-payment plan rejected Ohio's top court strikes down 2009-34 billing for current fuel, repair costs
COLUMBUS -- "The Ohio Supreme Court yesterday struck down FirstEnergy Corp.'s plan to defer up to $150 million a year in increased fuel and other costs for three years and then recoup those costs from customers over 25 years, beginning in 2009. In a 6-1 decision, the court said it was illegal under Ohio's 1999 electric deregulation law for the Akron parent company of Toledo Edison to put off billing for higher costs for fuel, tree-trimming, and storm damage associated with generating electricity from 2006 through 2008 and then later raise the bills for customers on the distribution from 2009 through 2034 to make up for it,'" Jim Provance, Toledo Blade.Aug 28: No rush on re-regulation TOLEDO -- "Governor Ted Strickland has set a high bar for what should be his next major legislative initiative: re-regulating the electric business in Ohio. We use the term 're-regulating' because it is glaringly obvious that the state’s nearly decade-long experiment with electric deregulation has been a colossal failure and must be corrected," editorial, Toledo Blade. Aug 26: Debate about to begin on electric deregulation COLUMBUS -- "Mr. Strickland is expected to begin the debate any day now as Ohio faces a deadline of Jan. 1, 2009, the date that, absent any legislative action, would send Ohio consumers into an electricity market where competition hasn't developed. Rather than the promised bargains, consumers in other states like Maryland and Illinois who got to the market early found sticker shock.
'If we do nothing, I think we'll have a chaotic, intolerable set of circumstances that will lead to a lack of predictability, most likely an exploding cost to consumers and industrial users of electricity,' Mr. Strickland said. 'It will be a very volatile situation that introduces unaccept-able uncertainty into our state's economy,'" Jim Provance, Toledo Blade.Aug 20: Stakes high in race to re-regulate utilities
COLUMBUS -- "With Gov. Ted Strickland about to release a new energy plan, a sudden and strong consensus has formed in the state: Relaxing government controls on electric companies was a bad idea...
At most, supporters of deregulation described it as one factor among many that led to events like the Northeast blackout or the rolling California brownouts. They felt it premature, at least publicly, to say the trend toward relaxed regulation that swept the country in the 1990s was the root cause of the turmoil.
But with interim rate stabilization plans set to expire in Ohio at the end of 2008, interest groups on all sides appear to have agreed that deregulation was a failure and should be replaced. Contemporary thinking is that competition and low rates never materialized, and won't without government helping control rates, manage demand and urge efficiency," Julie Carr Smyth, Associated Press.Aug 19: AEP bill higher, but not so bad? COLUMBUS -- "For Schriber, there's no question. Rate-stabilization plans saved Ohioans money, especially compared with other states in similar situations, he said... But Janine Migden-Ostrander, the Ohio consumers' counsel, isn't willing to say the rate plans saved Ohioans money. The downside to the rate-stabilization plans was that utilities didn't have to open their books in order to levy surcharges, she said. 'We don't have a chance to look at things in the depth that we think is appropriate," she said. "The ends do not justify the means when the process is not appropriate,'" Paul Wilson, Columbus Dispatch. Aug 16: NRC lets utility off lightly in data case FirstEnergy told to alter training
OAK HARBOR -- The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has effectively let FirstEnergy Corp. off with a warning for waiting three months before producing contradictory information the utility had gathered about the near-rupture of Davis-Besse’s reactor head in 2002. The utility could have lost its operating licenses for Davis-Besse, Perry nuclear plant east of Cleveland, and its twin-reactor nuclear complex in western Pennsylvania over the ordeal, because the regulatory agency saw potential for national safety implications in suppressed data that two FirstEnergy consultants had compiled," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade.OAK HARBOR -- FirstEnergy ordered to give workers added training, John Funk, Cleveland Plain Dealer. Aug 9: Feds applaud Davis-Besse for '06 operations OAK HARBOR -- "Davis-Besse last night got kudos for its 2006 operating performance. But federal regulators kept mum about the status of possible sanctions against FirstEnergy Corp. for seeking a $200 million insurance payment for the plant's old reactor head that nearly blew apart in 2002. The NRC is expected to spend at least two more weeks reviewing FirstEnergy's rationale for the insurance claim, Viktoria Mitlyng, an agency spokesman, said," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Aug 4: CLOSED CIRCUIT Nuclear Safety Reports Called Into Question
NEW YORK -- "How many mishaps have occurred over the years -- and is the rate getting better or worse? It's hard to know. That's because every day, the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency deletes from its Web site any rated incident that's more than six months old. The agency says it doesn't want to penalize more-forthcoming countries by making it look like they have poor safety records... The most serious nuclear plant incident in the U.S. in recent years occurred at the Davis-Besse plant in Oak Harbor, Ohio, in 2002. There, a pineapple-size cavity, caused by extensive corrosion, was found in the lid of the reactor pressure vessel, which houses the fuel core," Steve Stecklow, Wall Street Journal.Jun 28: FirstEnergy gets mild nuke rebuke NRC fails to address issuing different stories on reactor hole
ROCKVILLE, MD -- NRC 'disappointed' in Davis-Besse insurance claim, Utility says it's committed to safety, Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Jun 18: FirstEnergy's third story of its role in Davis-Besse reactor damage spins spin TOLEDO -- "Most irritating is FirstEnergy's claim that it has never really altered its position because it always accepted responsibility for the hole. Initially FirstEnergy accepted blame for failing to do inspections that would have found the hole. But for the insurance case, FirstEnergy seemed to claim that it was blameless, even if it was responsible. We don't buy that hair-splitting. The federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission should rake FirstEnergy over the coals for its flip-flop-flip. Yanking the company's nuclear operating license might not be so bad. Who knows what FirstEnergy will do or say anymore on any given day about the operation of its nuclear reactors?," editorial, Lorain Morning Journal . Jun 15: Utility disavows nuclear plant report TOLEDO -- "Penitent and humbled, FirstEnergy Corp. says its own consultants were wrong to argue the utility couldn't have prevented a rust hole that crippled the Davis-Besse nuclear reactor five years ago. In a 63-page sworn document that amounts to an extended apology, the Akron-based utility told the Nuclear Regulatory Commission this week that it could not endorse many of the arguments its paid consultants made last December in reports meant to help FirstEnergy collect a $200 million insurance claim for the extensive Davis-Besse damage," John Funk and John Mangels, Cleveland Plain Dealer. TOLEDO -- FirstEnergy accepts blame for Davis-Besse oversight, Utility admits rust was preventable, Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. Jun 8: Claim may retrigger criminal probe FirstEnergy's insurance case contradicts NRC on Davis-Besse TOLEDO -- "The argument FirstEnergy Corp. is making to its insurer -- that the utility did nothing to intentionally cause corrosion damage at its Davis-Besse nuclear plant -- contradicts the official findings of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's investigation into the rust fiasco. The disparity between the NRC's conclusions about FirstEnergy's culpability at Davis-Besse and the version FirstEnergy's consultant is telling in an insurance feud already has landed the utility in hot water with nuclear regulators," John Mangels, Cleveland Plain Dealer. May 28: The Davis-Besse dance TOLEDO -- "FirstEnergy Corp. may not be trying to rewrite the history of the 2002 near-catastrophe at the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant, but a whole lot of spinning is going on. FirstEnergy, parent of Toledo Edison, paid $33.5 million in federal fines after it neglected to take care of corrosion from leaking acid, which had eaten most of the way through Davis-Besse's reactor lid over a period of years... Now, seeking to recoup $200 million from its insurer, the utility has drummed up consultants' reports claiming that the bulk of the corrosion occurred in a matter of a few weeks and was pretty much unavoidable," Editorial, Toledo Blade.May 23: Beaver power plant emission violations at heart of lawsuit SHIPPINGPORT, PA -- "Susan Bird said she blames air pollution from the nearby Bruce Mansfield Power Plant in Shippingport, Beaver County, for her two younger sons' neurological disorders, including one boy's autism. Ralph Hysong, who also lives one mile from the plant, said he feels good only when he travels outside Beaver County. 'We no longer grow a garden or have fruit trees, especially after last year's major upset that spewed grimy ash for several miles,' he said," David Templeton, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. SHIPPINGPORT, PA -- Environmentalists will sue if FirstEnergy doesn't clean up, Bob Bauder, Beaver County Times Allegheny Times. May 21: 'All of the above' won't cut it
May 19: Regulators skeptical of Davis-Besse report Data contradict research, Justice Dept. says
TOLEDO -- FirstEnergy is focused on safety, Letter to the Editor, FirstEnergy CEO Anthony Alexander, Toledo Blade. May 17: Reports assert Davis-Besse reactor deteriorated swiftly FirstEnergy calls '02 incident a fluke, seeks to collect $200M from insurer TOLEDO -- "The future of FirstEnergy Corp.'s nuclear operating company could depend on how firmly the utility continues to stand behind a pair of reports that suggests the near-rupture of Davis-Besse's old reactor head in 2002 was a fluke... It concluded most of Davis-Besse's old head deteriorated from leaky reactor acid in the final three weeks before the plant's historic two-year outage began on Feb. 16, 2002, in contrast to government research - which FirstEnergy had never disputed - that the problem took years to unfold," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. May 16: Utility's claim has NRC fuming FirstEnergy risks license over answers to reversal on Davis-Besse
LORAIN -- Nuclear nightmare story at Davis-Besse takes a new twist, hard to buy, editorial, The Morning Journal. May 15: Reactor owner in hot water with NRC FirstEnergy actions displease regulators WASHINGTON -- "FirstEnergy Corp. could face sanctions by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for attempting to process a $200 million insurance claim with a pair of reports that contradicts what the company previously said regarding the near-rupture of Davis-Besse's old reactor head in 2002... The NRC, consequently, has issued a 'Demand for Information,' which compels FirstEnergy to answer key questions under oath. It faces more legal action if it is caught misleading the government or providing incomplete information," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. WASHINGTON -- NRC demands Davis-Besse explanation, Patrick O'Donnell, Cleveland Plain Dealer. WASHINGTON -- NRC demands information from FirstEnergy regarding Davis-Besse nuclear power plant, Nuclear Regulatory Commission. May 13: New Davis-Besse report making waves Some raise questions as utility shifts stand on reactor lid rust hole CLEVELAND -- "At the time, the utility paid $33.5 million in criminal and civil fines to acknowledge its culpability for failing to stop the corrosion and for misleading government regulators that the deteriorating lid on the Toledo-area reactor was OK. Now, FirstEnergy is arguing it wasn't negligent at Davis-Besse.
The utility bases its drastic change of heart on a new analysis it paid for in its attempt to win a $200 million insurance dispute. FirstEnergy's retooled version of events is that corrosion ate through the steel lid so quickly -- in four months, not the previously accepted four years -- that normal biennial inspections couldn't have caught it," John Mangels and John Funk, Cleveland Plain Dealer. May 5: NRC fails to address new report on reactor
TOLEDO -- "The Nuclear Regulatory Commission apparently is not going to give U.S. District Court Judge David Katz a straight answer about a controversial 661-page report prepared by two FirstEnergy Corp. consultants. The report could be used to absolve the utility of liability for the near-rupture of Davis-Besse's old reactor head in 2002 and help the company process a $200 million insurance claim. The report, prepared by Exponent Failure Analysis Association of Menlo, Calif., and Altran Solutions Corp. of Boston, has huge legal implications for the government's case against two former Davis-Besse workers and a former contractor who have been indicted on charges of misleading the NRC," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. TOLEDO -- NRC says new checks enough to catch leaks, John Mangels and John Funk, Cleveland Plain Dealer. May 4: Davis-Besse may operate during NRC review TOLEDO -- "The Nuclear Regulatory Commission yesterday affirmed that Davis-Besse and 68 other nuclear plants will be allowed to continue normal operations while the government agency assesses a controversial 661-page report that FirstEnergy Corp. is using in hopes of processing a $200 million insurance claim. The document purports that most of the damage to Davis-Besse's old reactor head was the result of accelerated corrosion during the last three weeks before the plant was shut down for two years on Feb. 16, 2002, contrary to what the NRC itself has said. Agency officials previously attributed the plant's dangerous condition to a pattern of utility negligence over years," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. May 2: NRC silence over reactor report is questioned Paper on Davis-Besse not backed or rejected TOLEDO -- "A federal judge. A congressman. And now one of the nuclear industry's most notorious watchdog groups. All three want to know this: Why has the Nuclear Regulatory Commission failed to either dismiss or endorse a controversial 661-page report about the near-rupture of Davis-Besse's old reactor head in 2002? The document, prepared by FirstEnergy Corp. consultants, could absolve the utility of negligence accusations so it can proceed with a $200 million insurance claim," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. May 1: Davis-Besse rust report irks watchdog CLEVELAND -- "If the rust hole that took the Davis-Besse nuclear reactor to the brink of disaster five years ago grew as fast as the utility's consultants now believe, the nation's nuclear fleet could be just as vulnerable, a watchdog group said Monday. But if the new 700-page engineering consultants' corrosion report commissioned by plant owner FirstEnergy Corp. is just a bid to collect on insurance from the rust damage, then the Akron utility should lose its nuclear operating license, the Union of Concerned Scientists said," John Funk and John Mangels, Cleveland Plain Dealer. Apr 21: Insurance claim to delay trial for 3 ex-Davis-Besse workers
TOLEDO -- " FirstEnergy Corp.'s attempt to recoup $200 million from an insurance policy has caused a four-month delay in the criminal prosecution of three workers formerly associated with the utility's Davis-Besse nuclear plant in Ottawa County.
U.S. District Court Judge David Katz said at a hearing yesterday that he had no choice but to postpone the trial of Andrew Siemaszko to Sept. 10 and that of his two co-defendants, David Geisen and Rodney N. Cook, to Oct. 9 because of assertions made in a 661-page report by two FirstEnergy consultants," Tom Henry, Toledo Blade.Apr 6: Nuclear disaster was close at hand Corrosion of lid at Davis-Besse was quick, study says
CLEVELAND -- Kucinich: Local power plant closer to major release of radiation than imagined, Paul Thomas, WKYC. TOLEDO -- Report challenges reactor leak findings, Tom Henry, Toledo Blade. WASHINGTON, DC -- Nuclear plant owner seeks payment for lost production, Matthew Wald, New York Times. Mar 22: 3 Davis-Besse ex-staffers get a deadline to bargain pleas TOLEDO -- "Three former Davis-Besse workers blamed by federal prosecutors for one of the nuclear industry's biggest coverups have until April 9 to negotiate plea deals...
The trio - former FirstEnergy Corp. engineers Andrew Siemaszko and David Geisen, plus outside contractor Rodney N. Cook - are accused of lying to the government about the plant's dangerous condition in the fall of 2001. They face five years in prison and $250,000 in fines if convicted," Toledo Blade. Older news 2006 2005: Jan-May, Jun-Dec 2004: Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr-May, Jun-Aug, Sep-Dec 2003: Jan-Feb, Mar-Apr, May-Jun, Jul-Aug, Sep-Oct, Nov-Dec 2002: Jan-Jun, Jul-Aug, Sep-Oct, Nov-Dec 2001 |
Chronology: N. Ohio electric utility campaigns U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission photos of Davis-Besse damage Ohio Consumers' Counsel Union of Concerned Scientists Davis-Besse restart dates Older news 2006: Jan-Dec 2005: Jan-May 2004: Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr-May, Jun-Aug, Sep-Dec 2003: Jan-Feb, Mar-Apr, May-Jun, Jul-Aug, Sep-Oct, Nov-Dec 2002: Jan-Jun, Jul-Aug, Sep-Oct, Nov-Dec 2001 |