![]() |
| ||||||||||||
|
|
INSIDE News » The Plain Dealer » Newsflash » Weather » Traffic » Paid Death Notices » News Obituaries » PD Obituaries » Opinion » Business » Crime » Politics » Education
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
News
Texas reactor's bottom appears to be leaking
04/18/03
A Texas utility with a pressurized water reactor similar to Ohio's
Davis-Besse plant has told federal regulators the bottom of its reactor
vessel appears to be leaking. "Their preliminary thinking is they do have a small crack," Brian
Sheron, Nuclear Regulatory Commission associate director for licensing,
said yesterday after speaking with managers at the South Texas Project, in
Bay City, Texas, south of Houston. If confirmed by additional tests, the finding would be an unexpected
and serious development, with potential consequences for the nation's
commercial nuclear fleet. It is also possible, however, that the leak
resulted from some unique condition that does not exist at other plants,
Sheron said. For now, the agency is closely following the plant's work to pin down
the source of the traces of dried coolant. South Texas workers found the
residue at two locations on the reactor's base last weekend, during a
refueling shutdown. No reactor has ever before been shown to have cracks or leaks in the
instrument-carrying tubes that pierce the bottom of the heavy steel
reactor vessel, although workers found traces of possible leaks at the
bottom of the Davis-Besse reactor last summer. Davis-Besse owner
FirstEnergy Corp. believes the residue washed down during attempts to
clean the reactor's lid rather than leaking from the bottom. But it has
scheduled a test in May to be sure. The NRC is concerned that if an undetected leak in the reactor's base
becomes large enough, it could stymie the ability of the plant's emergency
pumps to keep the hot, radioactive fuel bathed with coolant. Regulators and the nuclear industry had thought the reactor bottom was
invulnerable to cracks. The NRC does not require inspections there,
although some plants do them voluntarily. Temperatures in the reactor's
base are lower than in the vessel's upper reaches - 560 degrees or so,
compared to nearly 600 around the lid - so it was believed that the
material used to weld the instrument tubes in place wouldn't be exposed to
the heat stresses that can cause the welds to crack and leak. An inspection 18 months ago showed no signs of leakage on the reactor
bottom, Sheron said the plant's operator told him. However, a lab test
indicated the deposits could be several years old, he said. South Texas officials could not be reached for comment yesterday. - John Funk and John Mangels
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
About Us | Help/Feedback | Advertise With Us Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement. Please read our Privacy Policy. ©2003 cleveland.com. All Rights Reserved.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||