![]() |
| ||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() | ||||||||||||
|
|
INSIDE Business » The Plain Dealer » Autos » Bankrate » BusinessMonday » Market Updates » NewsFlash » Personal Finance » Plain Dealer 100 » SBN Online » Tech
|
\n'); } if ( plugin ) { document.write(''); } else if (!(navigator.appName && navigator.appName.indexOf("Netscape")>=0 && navigator.appVersion.indexOf("2.")>=0)){ document.write('
![]() ![]() ![]()
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Business News
Special-fee information sought from FirstEnergy
11/19/03
FirstEnergy Corp.'s monthly "transition charge" for past nuclear plant
construction has become an issue in its proposal before state regulators
to extend current electric rates through 2008. Green Mountain Energy, which supplies power at a discount to about
450,000 Greater Clevelanders through a contract with the Northeast Ohio
Public Energy Council, wants the Akron utility to reveal how much it has
collected through the transition charge in the last three years. Green Mountain and NOPEC yesterday filed a request with the Public
Utilities Commission of Ohio to compel FirstEnergy to divulge the amount
in an open hearing. The move came a day after three Greater Cleveland environmental and
neighborhood groups asked the PUCO to take another look at the surcharge
that FirstEnergy can collect through 2005 as the state moves toward full
deregulation of retail electric sales. The surcharge, they said, adds
between 30 and 40 percent to an average monthly bill. The three groups - Consumers for Fair Utility Rates, the Neighborhood
Environmental Coalition and the Empowerment Center of Greater Cleveland -
want the state to pay for a study to determine how much FirstEnergy should
be able to pass on to consumers for the cost of the nuclear plants. Three
years ago, a study for the Ohio Consumers' Counsel recommended FirstEnergy
should receive no more than $2.6 billion; the state ultimately agreed to
allow a total of $8.7 billion. Consumers' Counsel Rob Tongren resigned this month amid controversy
about his decision to go along with that settlement and his subsequent
destruction of the consultant's report. Green Mountain's request for the amount of transition charges collected
is irrelevant, said FirstEnergy spokesman Ralph DiNicola, because the
company has not filed an actual rate case. It has instead offered to
extend the current rates - or move to deregulation in 2006 as originally
planned, exposing consumers to prevailing market rates. The three consumer groups also asked the PUCO to make a "reasonable
schedule," which they believe would be nine months, to consider
FirstEnergy's proposal. Responding to the utility's request to expedite the case, the PUCO has
scheduled public hearings for: 5 p.m. Friday at the Seagate Convention
Center in Toledo; 4 p.m. Monday at the State Office Building in Cleveland;
and 6 p.m. Tuesday at the Kent State University Kiva student center
auditorium. To reach this Plain Dealer reporter: jfunk@plaind.com, 216-999-4138
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About Us | Help/Feedback | Advertise With Us Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement. Please read our Privacy Policy. ©2003 cleveland.com. All Rights Reserved.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||