![]() |
| ||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() | ||||||||||||
|
|
INSIDE News » The Plain Dealer » Newsflash » Weather » Traffic » Obituaries » Opinion » Business » Crime » Politics » Education
|
![]()
| ||||||||||||||||||||
News
1 year later, Davis-Besse waits 03/06/03
Today marks the first anniversary of the discovery of a rust hole in
the lid of the Davis-Besse nuclear reactor, and owner FirstEnergy Corp. is
still not certain when federal authorities will allow the plant to
restart. The Akron-based utility poured $298 million into repairs at the plant
last year and has budgeted another $50 million so far this year. The cost
of buying replacement power has added another $170 million to $205
million, making Davis-Besse a $500 million-plus headache, not to mention a
public-relations nightmare. Still, FirstEnergy's stock has outperformed the Dow Jones utility index
and, currently priced below $30 a share, is considered a buy in the
opinion of many analysts. It's the bond-rating agencies that could become a thorn in the
company's side, especially if the plant is not back on line by summer -
when electric utilities make a lot of money - because they fear it could
interfere with FirstEnergy's plans to pay down its debt. Standard & Poor moved its outlook for the company to negative in
April 2002 because it believed fixing the nuclear plant would take a long
time. S&P's corporate rating for FirstEnergy is BBB, though certain
bonds are BBB minus, the lowest investment grade. "We understand the Nuclear Regulatory Commission can take its time,"
said Aneesh Prabhu, an associate director at S&P. "But if this outage
becomes longer than April . . . particularly if it heads toward the summer
months, and it affects their cash flow, we will have discussions. It could
become a credit issue." "Our position has been the same all along," Prabhu said. "I think the
company understands from a credit point of view that the plant is
important. They need the power." Fitch also revised its rating outlook for FirstEnergy from stable to
negative and currently gives a corporate rating of BBB. The agency is
closely following the situation, said analysts Philip Smyth and Robert
Hornick. "The company is projecting the plant could be back on line in late
March or April. We think that could slip a bit," said Smyth. "There is wiggle room as long as it is not a major delay. If we come to
June and it is not operating, we will have to make an assessment." Company officials maintain they will have the 925-megawatt reactor
ready to begin generating electricity sometime in April - but quickly add
that the NRC has the final say. "We have not seen any reason why the plant cannot come back into
service, based on the work we have done," said company spokesman Ralph DiNicola. "Our goal is to
have the work done in April, but the NRC could determine there is more to
do." NRC officials have, in fact, indicated that April seems overly
ambitious and said inspections will take at least through May. Jack Grobe,
chairman of a special panel overseeing FirstEnergy's efforts, has
repeatedly stressed the agency does not have a timetable. Workers reloaded the reactor's fuel last week and plan to bolt down the
new lid next week, said spokesman Todd Schneider. The reactor will not be
restarted, however. Instead, crews will test the reactor building for air
leaks near the end of the month, and then test the reactor itself for
leaks in early April, he said. The other potential problem for an April restart is the NRC's directive
that the company must prove the "safety culture" at Davis-Besse has
improved and that workers are encouraged to report potential safety
problems. The company previously admitted that its plant managers
emphasized production over safety and did not address safety concerns when
they were brought up. None of this is encouraging to bond analysts. "A prompt Davis-Besse start-up is critical to maintaining the ratings,
in our view," wrote Dot Matthews of independent research company
CreditSights. "We think there is a real possibility of downgrades to below investment
grade if Davis-Besse continues to be delayed," Matthews advised her
institutional clients. "Despite all of FirstEnergy's efforts to improve
performance and cash flow, the near-term risk on this credit comes down to
one nuke plant." Matthews yesterday said CEO H. Peter Burg's statement in December that
the company would not allow the plant "to become a black hole" and would
consider "other options" if the NRC's restart approval began to drag on
was troubling. "That was the first time anybody associated with the company even
hinted there might be a problem with starting it back up," she said. "That
got my attention." On the other side of the street, analysts of the company's stock are
far more optimistic. "Two years ago a sick nuke plant would have been a very strong
negative, but relative to the other problems out there [among utilities],
it's not being perceived as negatively as it would have been," said Paul
Ridzon of McDonald Investments, who rates the stock a buy. Ridzon does not
own the stock, but his firm does do investment banking with FirstEnergy.
"Not that Davis-Besse doesn't bother anybody," he said, "but investors
can look past this because we know the problem isn't going to be there in
two years." The declines in FirstEnergy's stock price have pretty much followed the
Dow Jones utility index, said James Halloran, energy analyst at National
City's Private Investment Advisers. "The group as a whole has been hammered," he said. "It was not specific
to FirstEnergy." Since March 11, 2002, the day before the company told the press about
the rust hole, FirstEnergy's stock has fallen 23.8 percent, said Halloran.
"But if you owned utilities as a whole, you would be down 33.6
percent," he said, adding that during the same period the company
out-performed the Dow Jones index of 500 top stocks by 4.7 percent. National City, which owns 39,000 shares of the stock, has a hold on it.
"We are waiting to see how this [Davis-Besse] finishes," Halloran said.
"But we are not telling anybody to sell it. "The point is that it has not been that bad an investment. Davis-Besse
is not the whole company. It's a distraction, but it will become a more
significant distraction if they get into summer and do not have a date
when they can restart." To reach this Plain Dealer reporter: jfunk@plaind.com, 216-999-4138
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
About Us | Help/Feedback | Advertise With Us Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement. Please read our Privacy Policy. ©2003 cleveland.com. All Rights Reserved.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||