The New York Times The New York Times New York Region February 14, 2003  

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
- The City
- Columns
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
NYC Guide
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia/Photos
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version

Get 25 commission-free trades from Ameritrade.


Go to Advanced Search/ArchiveGo to Advanced Search/ArchiveSymbol Lookup
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  Welcome, paulryder1

Nuclear Agency to Test Defenses of Indian Pt. With Assault Drill

By RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD

For the first time since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will resume mock armed assaults on nuclear plants, including an invasion of the Indian Point nuclear power plant in Westchester County this spring or summer.

The commission had suspended the drills after the 9/11 attacks to develop new exercises that better reflected terrorist threats. But commission members told Congress yesterday that revamped drills would resume this year, starting at four plants including an exercise in June or July, or possibly earlier, at Indian Point, 35 miles north of Midtown Manhattan, in Buchanan.

"I think we agree that that is clearly a priority," Jeffrey S. Merrifield, a member of the commission, said under questioning by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has pressed for the drills in light of heightened anxiety over safety and security at the plant.

The so-called force-on-force drills will also be conducted more frequently, every three years instead of every eight years. The last such drill at Indian Point was in March 1994.

Word of the drills came as the commission weathered controversy over remarks by its chairman, Richard A. Meserve, who a day earlier criticized a state-commissioned report on emergency plans for apparently giving "undue weight" to the impact of a terrorist attack on the plant.

Mr. Meserve last month began notifying members of Congress about the new drills, without identifying the plants. Mrs. Clinton had urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to include Indian Point among the first to be tested. She also encouraged the Entergy Corporation, which owns the plant, to volunteer to be among the first, and it did so, a commission spokeswoman said.

Antinuclear activists and other critics have questioned, particularly after Sept. 11, how well the nation's 103 active reactors are guarded, pointing to reports of fatigued and unprepared security officers.

In a report written for Entergy last year, a majority of the guards at the Indian Point plant said they doubted that they could thwart terrorists, and several were found to be out of shape and lacking training. Entergy has said that since the report was delivered it has improved the training of the security force and has put in place a variety of measures to foil terrorists.

In past drills, a small team of intruders would enter a plant's premises and, with simulated weapons, try to outmaneuver the security guards to get to vulnerable areas.

Critics have derided the drills for involving only a handful of intruders and for the fact that the nuclear commission tells the plant in advance when the drill will take place. Commission officials have said the mock intruders in half of the cases reached vulnerable areas, potentially causing a release of radiation.

Diane Screnci, a spokeswoman for the commission, said it would have new regulations governing the exercises in place next month. But she said the commission still planned to notify the plants in advance because they must assign certain guards for the exercise while the others continue guarding the plant.

Mrs. Clinton, who questioned members of the commission appearing before the Senate Subcommittee on Clean Air, Climate Change and Nuclear Safety, said afterward, "This will help us determine where we stand when it comes to security at Indian Point."

Jim Steets, a spokesman for Entergy, said the company welcomed the drills as an opportunity to demonstrate the strength of its security force, which he said had been bolstered since 9/11. Last month Entergy announced that it would merge the two security forces at the plant, a legacy from a time when different owners operated the two active reactors. Entergy bought Indian Point 3 from the New York Power Authority in 2000 and Indian Point 1, which is defunct, and Indian Point 2 from Con Edison in 2001.

"We are willing participants," Mr. Steets said. "We would be more than happy to be one of the early places to be tested."

Alex Matthiessen, executive director of Riverkeeper, an environmental organization that has raised concerns about safety and security at the plant, said he was elated that Indian Point would be among the first plants tested.

"As the nuclear plant in the most densely populated area, I think it is fitting and appropriate to subject it to the force-on-force testing this year," Mr. Matthiessen said.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission declined to discuss how the drills would be conducted.





New York Seeks Cooperation On Indian Pt. Emergency Plan  (February 5, 2003)  $

Officials Quarrel Over Plan For Indian Point Emergency  (February 4, 2003)  $

Albany Says It Can't Certify Indian Pt. Plan  (January 31, 2003)  $

THREATS AND RESPONSES: NUCLEAR PLANTS; Study Warns Attack on Fuel Could Pose Serious Hazards  (January 30, 2003)  $

Find more results for Atomic Energy and Terrorism .



Doing research? Search the archive for more than 500,000 articles:




E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints

Wake up to the world with home delivery of The New York Times newspaper.
Click Here for 50% off.


Home | Back to New York Region | Search | Corrections | Help | Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy
E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints



Advertisement


Topics

 Alerts
Atomic Energy
Terrorism
New York State
Create Your Own | Manage Alerts
Take a Tour
Sign Up for Newsletters










The latest Mutual Funds Report is now available at NYTimes.com. The Times takes a look at the fourth quarter as well as where things may be headed in 2003.
Click here to read the report.