Middletown     Web


  Tell me how to:
  Buy a subscription
  Buy a print ad
  Buy an online ad
  Reach newsroom
  Reach web staff
  Write to the editor
  Set my homepage


AK's CEO bonuses survive

By Thomas Gnau, Journal Business Writer, E-mail:

More attention is being paid to how corporate chief executives are paid — and some of that attention is turning to AK Steel Corp.’s Richard Wardrop.

A recent Wall Street Journal story examined how corporations with “ailing pension plans” are protecting bonuses paid to the highest executives.

AK saw pension expense contributing to a loss of just more than $500 million for the year in 2002.

But executive bonuses were “unharmed” by this loss, the newspaper reported, with Wardrop, AK’s chairman and chief executive, receiving $7.7 million in two years.

AK’s most recent proxy statement, filed in April, reports that Wardrop in 2002 received a base salary of $1.3 million, an annual bonus of $2.6 million, restricted stock awards of just more than $1.2 million and a long-term payout of just more than $2.2 million for AK’s performance in a three-year period ending Dec. 31, 2002.

In 2001, Wardrop’s base salary was $1.25 million, the proxy said. He received a bonus of $750,000 that year, restricted stock of $735,000 and a long-term performance payout of $2.125 million.

“Notwithstanding a net loss for book purposes, the (company) approved the payment of bonuses to all annual management incentive plan participants based upon safety, quality and financial performance, which substantially exceeded performance targets for 2002,” the proxy said.

Excluding pension expense, the proxy said AK saw an operating profit per ton of steel shipped higher than its competitors last year.

AK Vice President of Public Affairs Alan McCoy declined to comment.

Wardrop’s compensation doesn’t seem inordinate, however, to independent steel industry analyst Charles Bradford. Bradford said 2002 executive pay reflects 2001 corporate performance.

“I think the actual pay is quite low compared to other industries,” Bradford said.

He said pension performance is suffering across the corporate world because equity markets have trended down in the last three years. And AK doesn’t manage that money, he added. Independent money managers do.

Still, AK’s pension performance “is not as bad as most. I mean, all you have to do is look at the Standard & Poor’s Index,” Bradford said.

He added: “What does he (Wardrop) have to do with the pensions? They have a pension system that hasn’t changed.”

But Paul Hodgson, senior research associate with the Corporate Library — an independent research firm focused on corporate governance — noted that Wardrop’s long-term performance payout takes 2002 performance into account.

Hodgson called Wardrop’s pay “out of line.” Hodgson pointed to U.S. Steel CEO Thomas Usher, who received a base salary of $1.1 million, and an annual bonus of $1.243 million, in 2002. And Nucor’s Daniel DiMicco saw a base salary of $494,685, with a bonus of $321,545, in 2002, Hodgson noted.

STANDARD & POOR’S steel industry analyst Leo Larkin believes that nearly every steelmaker chief executive, except DiMicco, is overpaid.

Pointing to Wardrop, Larkin said: “It (his pay) certainly makes no sense considering what has taken place under his stewardship.”

U.S. Steel, with about 24,000 employees in steel-related work, is an integrated steelmaker like AK, making steel from raw materials like iron ore. Nucor, with 9,800 employees, is a mini-mill, which melts scrap metal and has a different approach to business. Middletown-based AK has about 10,000 employees, including about 4,000 in Middletown.

U.S. Steel and Nucor both have larger market capitalizations than AK. A “market cap” is the total dollar value of a publicly traded company’s outstanding shares and is often cited to measure corporate size.

Ed Shelley, president of Armco Employees Independent Federation, which represents more than 3,000 AK workers in Middletown, said his main concern is not the size of Wardrop’s paycheck.

“My principal concern is the viability of this company, and the benefits, the standard of living of the workers and the retirees,” Shelley said.

Recently, AK asked AEIF representatives to talk about ways to make the company more competitive. An initial meeting was held Thursday, and another is tentatively set for next Thursday.

For AK, this year and last have been challenging. The company has asked residents to write Gov. Bob Taft, seeking relief from a federal and state lawsuit against the company alleging environmental violations. And the company has said an array of pressures could lead to the end of “hot-end” steelmaking in Middletown — a loss of approximately 1,000 high-paying jobs.

Meanwhile, the company’s stock price has fallen from a high of $12.81 on June 28, 2002, to a low of $2.75 on April 30.

In terms of shareholder return, “They (AK) certainly have not outperformed their peers or the S&P (Standard & Poor’s) 500,” Hodgson said.

“It’s kind of scandalous in a way,” Larkin said.

Recently, though, AK’s stock has shown some signs of relative strength, closing at $3.55 Friday, up three cents from Thursday.

Wardrop and AK have been credited for holding their own in a tough climate for the steel industry. Fortune magazine last summer lauded AK for having “boosted efficiency while focusing on high-end steel for the automakers.” AK ranks 376th on the Fortune 500 list.

A Corporate Library study found median bonuses for CEOs running 1,019 public companies rose 9 percent in both 2001 and 2002, to $451,000. Long-term incentive payouts went from a median of about $500,000 in 2001 to more than $900,000 in 2002, the study found.

Total cash compensation for 2002 rose nearly 17 percent to a median of $1.2 million, the Corporate Library found.

Published 06.29.03



 Email this page to a friend

By using this service you accept the terms of our Visitor Agreement.
Registered site users, to edit your personal profile, click here.

© 2003 Cox Newspapers, Inc.
The Middletown Journal
Privacy Policy | About this site | Write to us