see the light.
the nation.
Moments later, a decidedly more serious O'Connor is at the Plough
and Stars pub near Central Square, engaged in a lively bit of
barstool democracy over the subject of his rap: his effort to repeal
a recently enacted restructuring of the state's electric power
industry. At the bar, O'Connor encounters a man who has actually
read a book O'Connor cowrote on the subject of renewable energy.
Even some of the beer-bellied working stiffs gather around to hear
O'Connor and his new acquaintance trade fabulously arcane details as
they debate how best to promote alternative energy. O'Connor even
names the exact figure the federal government spends on solar
energy.
These are the two John O'Connors: one a freewheeling urban jock,
the other an impassioned, power-to-the people environmentalist. Now
O'Connor is trying to stitch those two personas together in his bid
to represent the Massachusetts Eighth Congressional District, which
encompasses Belmont, Cambridge, Charlestown, Chelsea, Somerville,
Watertown, and half of Boston.
O'Connor, 43, is pitching himself as a long-time foe of corporate
America's greatest villains -- polluters, tobacco companies,
pharmaceutical giants. As someone who can be counted on to keep the
little guy from getting trampled in Washington and to preserve
democracy from corporate onslaught. Ralph Nader himself testifies in
one O'Connor brochure that "you can count on him to represent
workers, small taxpayers, and consumers against the `big business'
lobbies."
So far, O'Connor has been only a minor presence in polls. A
Boston Globe/WBZ-TV survey conducted at the beginning of the
campaign showed O'Connor at just 4 percent, well behind the
front-running Ray Flynn, with 21 percent. More-recent surveys
appear to show roughly the same results. But there is reason to
believe that O'Connor will be in the thick of things in the race's
chaotic final days.
Reason number one is, quite simply, money. O'Connor acquired a
fortune -- now between $5 million and $25 million,
according to his financial disclosure reports -- when he married
Star Market heiress Carolyn Mugar, whose brother has long bankrolled
Boston's Fourth of July fireworks extravaganza on the Esplanade.
Money means advertising, and O'Connor's ad machine is heating up.
This week, he began airing his second spot in the past two weeks --
an attack on Republican cuts in Medicare spending.
Second, recent events may give O'Connor the opportunity to
distinguish himself from Chris Gabrieli. As the race's two
multimillionaires, Gabrieli and O'Connor have routinely been paired
in the media's attempts to cover the jumbled, 13-candidate field. To
date, O'Connor has been somewhat overshadowed by Gabrieli's
$1.5 million-plus spending spree. But Gabrieli appears to have
gotten little poll movement for his money, and some observers now
wonder whether his moment of opportunity has passed. Worse, Gabrieli
may have been badly damaged by recent reports suggesting that a
medical software company he cofounded in the 1980s (and from which
he profited vastly) promoted just the sort of managed-care horrors
he has denounced in a series of TV and newspaper ads. With Gabrieli
at least temporarily limping, people may now take a closer look at
O'Connor.
Actually, what O'Connor probably wants most is to shake off
Gabrieli comparisons altogether. Says MassPIRG legislative director
Rob Sargent, a sometime political ally of O'Connor: "John must be
frustrated that he's labeled a millionaire businessman first -- and
then as an afterthought they say he's an environmentalist -- when in
fact he comes out of a long tradition of grassroots organizing and
environmental activism."
O'Connor has indeed built an impressive record of activism --
from union organizing in the 1970s to pushing major environmental
legislation in the 1980s to nurturing small enviro-businesses and
doing battle with the state legislature and the electric utility
industry in the 1990s. But then again, it's largely because of his
millions that a man with no prior experience in elective office is
being taken seriously in this campaign.
John O'Connor keeps a framed slogan in his office that neatly
sums up his philosophy: THE FUN IS IN THE FIGHT. From the basketball
court to the State House, O'Connor obviously relishes the
competition of a good battle. But the experience he credits with
turning him into a fighter was anything but fun.
O'Connor grew up in Stratford, Connecticut, an industrial town
then home to Raybestos, one of the largest asbestos makers in the
US. The company was a community anchor; O'Connor's Little League
team was even called the Raybestos Cardinals.
It wasn't until O'Connor's sophomore year at Clark University, in
Worcester, that he learned about Raybestos's possible responsibility
for high cancer rates in his neighborhood, and perhaps for the
cancer death of a Little League teammate. Even worse, O'Connor
learned that the company knew about the harmful effects of its
product -- and still let the kids play on a baseball diamond atop an
asbestos dump.
"When I discovered that the company was hurting us and never
telling us, my whole world-view was shattered," O'Connor says.
Today, the former Raybestos plant is the site of a massive federal
environmental cleanup. The experience, O'Connor said in his May 30
campaign kickoff speech, "made me vow that I wasn't going to sit
idly by and watch as innocent people die unnecessary, horrible,
preventable deaths."
From then on, O'Connor was a man with a mission. After college he
organized low- income Worcester neighborhoods for the Volunteers in
Service to America (VISTA) program. In 1983 O'Connor founded a
grassroots environmental movement, the National Toxics Campaign,
that ultimately culminated in the 1986 passage of Congress's
landmark Superfund environmental cleanup law.
Throughout that time, O'Connor was helping to fashion a new brand
of what you might call urban-populist environmentalism.
"He pioneered some of the key urban toxics issues, when
previously environmentalism had been preservation- and middle
class-oriented," says Lee Ketelsen, New England director of Clean
Water Action, a national environmental group that recently endorsed
O'Connor.
Since 1991, O'Connor has run Greenworks, a company that helps
"incubate" fledgling environmental businesses. But founding a
business didn't mean settling down.
Indeed, even as he runs his own campaign for Congress, O'Connor
is locked in a battle with the state's electric utilities over the
fate of a sweeping utility deregulation law passed by the
legislature last fall. O'Connor fought to block passage of the law,
which Ralph Nader called "the biggest consumer ripoff in
Massachusetts history," spending hundreds of thousands from his own
pocket on ads arguing that deregulation should have included
stronger environmental protections and delivered billions more in
savings for consumers.
Critics say O'Connor has exaggerated the evils of deregulation,
failed to propose a detailed alternative of his own, and foolishly
ignored the threat of economic chaos if the law is repealed now.
Even admirers think O'Connor may sometimes become too caught up in a
black-and-white world-view, raising the question of whether he has
the pragmatic instincts to deliver for his district on Capitol
Hill.
Undaunted by deregulation's passage, O'Connor is now fighting to
repeal it with a November ballot initiative -- an effort that
cleared its final hurdle last week when the state's Supreme Judicial
Court struck down a vehement industry challenge.
Which means O'Connor is not only running his own campaign, he's
also managing the repeal effort -- and he hints that they're not
unrelated.
"One way to get a free microphone is to run for Congress," he
says with characteristic frankness. "This is a way -- I hate to say
it -- to keep working on a issue that I care deeply about.
"We'll see what happens on September 15," O'Connor says. "But I'm
the only guy who wakes up the next day and has to go back to work
fighting the giant special interests."
The holy war against "giant special interests" is the central
theme of O'Connor's campaign. His television ads have already
blasted corporate polluters and pharmaceutical giants, whom he
attacks for making lavish profits from drugs developed with
government subsidies.
Of course, the environment remains O'Connor's favorite topic.
Don't get him started on pollution prevention, for instance, unless
you're prepared to learn why it's "in the interest of every dry
cleaner to buy a solvent recovery still," how the still recondenses
gas, and why reduced perclorethylene use is a good thing.
But when discussing issues outside the realm of energy and the
environment, O'Connor seems less energized, even if his grasp of
details is still formidable. On his top three nonenvironmental
priorities, he merely echoes his fellow candidates: he comes out
against privatizing Social Security and calls for universal health
insurance and an infusion of new funds into the schools. But then
Social Security, education, and health care lack clear villain
figures to rail against.
Perhaps it's just a matter of practice. After all, most of
O'Connor's opponents have spent years -- in some cases, a couple of
decades -- selling themselves to the public. That helps explain why
political handicappers still don't rank O'Connor in the race's top
tier with the likes of Flynn, Clapprood, Somerville mayor Mike
Capuano, and former Watertown state senator George Bachrach.
But the power of advertising may yet change that. Some may argue
that big spending has gotten Chris Gabrieli nowhere, but O'Connor
has a well-honed field operation to go along with his paid media
slots -- including the service of nearly 30 volunteers being trained
at an innovative "campaign school" run out of his Cambridge
headquarters.
O'Connor campaign manager and long-time liberal activist Jim
Braude argues that O'Connor's success will ultimately depend on
old-fashioned get-out-the-vote drives and door-to-door campaigning.
"Not only does John understand person-to-person contact," Braude
says, "it's the only way he knows how to do anything."
But that may be a curse as well as a blessing. There are indeed
two John O'Connors in this campaign. The laid-back O'Connor of
barstools and basketball courts leaves indelible impressions and
makes instant converts of strangers. The other, a more serious
figure, speaks gravely in television ads or talks dry policy at
candidates' forums. And in those settings, he is often flat and
uninspiring.
Watching O'Connor's TV spots, says political analyst Kevin
Sowyrda, "makes you want to hit the clicker the same way as when a
Tylenol ad comes on."
Would that every voter could have seen John O'Connor at the
Corporal Burns Playground in Cambridge one recent evening pursuing
his truest passion: basketball.
Many white people would have been intimidated by the young black
men hanging out in the shadows just off the courts. But O'Connor
easily cracked wise with these friends from his pickup and league
games over the years.
At one point, O'Connor was greeted by a black boy in his early
teens who wandered onto the court -- wearing a JOHN O'CONNOR FOR
CONGRESS T-shirt, no less. It seemed too good to be true. But asked
how it was that a young boy just happened to be wearing a campaign
slogan, a marveling aide offered a convincing explanation: O'Connor
had put the kid's older brother through college.
John O'Connor may yet surge into the top tier of candidates in
this race. It won't be easy. But if the election were decided on
moments like these, he would be all but invincible.
Michael Crowley can be reached at